Author Topic: which is better RAVENSHEILD or SOF2 (Read 8823 times)

[X]-Badboyb · « **on:** October 04, 2003, 03:13:36 PM »

tell me there are both first person shooter

Carigamers · « **on:** October 04, 2003, 03:13:36 PM »

Bob · « **Reply #1 on:** October 04, 2003, 03:47:07 PM »

Yes they are both First person shooters

But

Ravenshield appeals to people who like their shooters realistic and tactical. The skills you learned in quake will be of no use to you here.

SOF2 appeals to the all around action loving crowd little to no tactics are needed in this game .Its just pick up and play and not very realistic.

Personally I prefer Ravenshield but I'm always up for a good round of SOF2.

Ravenshield = realistic fun
SOF2 = quake-ish fun

Hope that clears everything up.

Neon · « **Reply #2 on:** October 04, 2003, 04:02:45 PM »

I prefer Ravenshield
but they really are 2 different typez of games
but.... if i'm feeling for realism - Ravenshield to craw
non realistic - Quake 3 .. to hell with shitty ass SOF2
bag of ballz

Imperial_X · « **Reply #3 on:** October 04, 2003, 04:14:31 PM »

Well said Neon.

Demon · « **Reply #4 on:** October 04, 2003, 05:29:19 PM »

Im not really an FPS sort of guy but ive been fond of ravenshield and i Sof2 just doesnt appeal to me

Carigamers · « **Reply #4 on:** October 04, 2003, 05:29:19 PM »

Set · « **Reply #5 on:** October 04, 2003, 05:35:52 PM »

i also find raven betta dan sof

mangoseed_89 · « **Reply #6 on:** October 04, 2003, 05:44:33 PM »

eh badboyb pullin allyuh leg
he duz always play ravenshield and sof2

Nebuchadnezzar · « **Reply #7 on:** October 04, 2003, 05:49:05 PM »

I can't believe this is even an issue...
SoF2 is for ppl with no talent but still want to run around and kill men
Ravenshield is for men of talent, men that can appreciate realistic scenarios and weapons

Set · « **Reply #8 on:** October 04, 2003, 05:56:21 PM »

i actually agree wit u dere neb
sof is an annoying game that is toooooooooo overated

mangoseed_89 · « **Reply #9 on:** October 04, 2003, 06:38:12 PM »

well said neb
really and truly ravenshield is a very strategic game
sof2 is a blood fest
now that is a real point and shoot*

SK3D · « **Reply #10 on:** October 04, 2003, 07:36:31 PM »

Okay here's what, the guy asked a simple question, which is better. For one thing obviously your answer is gonna be based on your preferance but jeez don't bash the game because of it's downfalls. Soldier of Fortune by heart is known for it's very bloody effects in terms of killing. Saying SOF2 is a game for people with no talent is out of the question. Certain members ARE better than others, clan DC for example. Obviously their skill level is pretty high up in the game because they are always practicing and playing it. You'll become good at anything you practice so if it's a game of no talent then why don't some of you just try to take them down running in guns-a-blazing anytime you feel like.

As for my pick out of the two I'd choose Ravenshield because I love Tom Clancy's games and have been playing rainbow six since part 1 on an old 8 mb video card back in the day. I love the realism and the point that it taxes my brain a bit more than Soldier of Fortune 2 does. In Ravenshield you can't really go in guns-a-blazing but such can be done in SOF2. All based on your preference.

(P)_zappreX · « **Reply #11 on:** October 04, 2003, 07:47:00 PM »

sof is shit ravenshield is bad

Heihachi · « **Reply #12 on:** October 04, 2003, 10:17:29 PM »

i must go for raven shield....it is better in most ways
but when i'm with friendz it's SOF all the way..

Crixx_Creww · « **Reply #13 on:** October 05, 2003, 02:10:31 AM »

Quote

Okay here's what, the guy asked a simple question, which is better. For one thing obviously your answer is gonna be based on your preferance but jeez don't bash the game because of it's downfalls. Soldier of Fortune by heart is known for it's very bloody effects in terms of killing. Saying SOF2 is a game for people with no talent is out of the question. Certain members ARE better than others, clan DC for example. Obviously their skill level is pretty high up in the game because they are always practicing and playing it. You'll become good at anything you practice so if it's a game of no talent then why don't some of you just try to take them down running in guns-a-blazing anytime you feel like.

As for my pick out of the two I'd choose Ravenshield because I love Tom Clancy's games and have been playing rainbow six since part 1 on an old 8 mb video card back in the day. I love the realism and the point that it taxes my brain a bit more than Soldier of Fortune 2 does. In Ravenshield you can't really go in guns-a-blazing but such can be done in SOF2. All based on your preference.

DONT BASH DE GAME CAUSE OF ITS DOWNFALLS???
WTMC YU SAYIN!!!

IF WE NOT SUPPOSED TO BASH IT CAUSE OF ITS DOWNFALLS! WAH WE SUPPOSED TO BASH IT OFFF OF?

HOW GOOD IT IS?

HMMM CHRONO TRIGGER IS AH HOT GAME, I THINK ILL BASH IT CAUSE ITS SOOO GOOD!

ORRRRR

HMM SOF2 IS AH PILE OF SMOLDERING DONKERY ASS BALLZ
I THINK ILL BASH IT CAUSE ITS CRAPPY!
steupsssssss
fire bun noobs.

raven shield gives yu that nice paranoia when yuh spinin rong corners
gets the heart racin, sof2 doesnt make yu really feeell the game.

the enjoyment only comes when yu win de whole thign or when something funny happens where as the enjoyment from raven comes from each heart pounding decision.

abnishcabamski · « **Reply #14 on:** October 05, 2003, 12:07:52 PM »

rs is better of course

SK3D · « **Reply #15 on:** October 05, 2003, 01:17:59 PM »

Quote

Quote
Okay here's what, the guy asked a simple question, which is better. For one thing obviously your answer is gonna be based on your preferance but jeez don't bash the game because of it's downfalls. Soldier of Fortune by heart is known for it's very bloody effects in terms of killing. Saying SOF2 is a game for people with no talent is out of the question. Certain members ARE better than others, clan DC for example. Obviously their skill level is pretty high up in the game because they are always practicing and playing it. You'll become good at anything you practice so if it's a game of no talent then why don't some of you just try to take them down running in guns-a-blazing anytime you feel like.

As for my pick out of the two I'd choose Ravenshield because I love Tom Clancy's games and have been playing rainbow six since part 1 on an old 8 mb video card back in the day. I love the realism and the point that it taxes my brain a bit more than Soldier of Fortune 2 does. In Ravenshield you can't really go in guns-a-blazing but such can be done in SOF2. All based on your preference.

DONT BASH DE GAME CAUSE OF ITS DOWNFALLS???
WTMC YU SAYIN!!!

There's a difference between bashing and sensible critisism

crazy_samurai · « **Reply #16 on:** October 05, 2003, 02:32:09 PM »

i agree with what samanosuke said
but i doh like sof again
raven sheild badda, hands down...
p.s. DC men doh post in here!!!!

Set · « **Reply #17 on:** October 05, 2003, 03:55:04 PM »

sof2 is a good is a good game if rel ppl playin and if u have no betta game to play
rs on the other hand isn't so ordinary

Battalion · « **Reply #18 on:** October 05, 2003, 04:21:46 PM »

They are both good games but in all seriousness
CAN WE PLEASE KILL THE VERMIN THAT IS SOF2. the game is just plain brainless shooting. I play if it is the only thing going but I prefer Raven Sheild.

Set · « **Reply #19 on:** October 05, 2003, 04:25:30 PM »

*i'll get the cheese and the mouse trap*

Carigamers · « **Reply #19 on:** October 05, 2003, 04:25:30 PM »

Author Topic: which is better RAVENSHEILD or SOF2 (Read 8823 times)

Carigamers

Carigamers

Nebuchadnezzar

Carigamers

ShoutBox