which would you get into a relationship 4:money or love?

[Computerman]

Well I've never had money, so that means my wife must love me!  :inlove:

I knew she married me for my rugged good looks!  :homer:                    

[Bob]

LOL@computerman                    

[Fault]

Hmmmmmm.... As a fellah who neva had much money(hopefully this new job will turn things around). I still say it makes no sense going into a relationship just for the money. But it also makes no sense going into a relationship with  a 'wutliss' person unless you want to end up in trouble along the line. As a male to me the onus is more on me to be financially secure and I think girls should look for guys with ambition and the ability/diligence to be financially secure in the future when he needs to( I don see how girls could be loving up some ah dem sprangers out dey nuh). So that aside I still want an ambitious girl who can hold us up while my chips are down. But I must love her.

Conclusion:  No love. No relationship .
                   No money? I could still work with that...

PerfectDrug does bring up a valid point ( ps gyal what's with the ... ... ... ... ... ?). What about Sex vs Love? A much more valid question. One I myself have wrestled with in times past. Let's not open up a new thread let's talk about it right here. I would go for Love still but hmmmm sex is probably one of the things that keeps ppl together and adds a great spice to a relationship It's all about feeling good in the end isn't it? When you're in love spending time with that person makes you 'feel good'.... Any Takers?                    

[Imperial_X]

*waits in the background for the insurgent rush of testosterone/estrogen driven kids to say something amusing*                    

[perfectdrug]

...i dont think that the guy needs to be more secure(financially)...
...there are some girls who prefer to be equal if not better(j/k) than their male counterpart...
...and sex probably adds spice and makes you feel good...
...but ppl should set priorities...

...and in response to laertes...
...there are quite a few mature ppl here...
...at least some i know...                    

[Kheulith]

well that just depends on the person, love is usually prefered but that really depends how u treat and value eachother... it can't really be summarised in little words...money can also be used to express love but love usually better ....but speaking as myself personally lafiel i have no comment on that opinion of u'res                    

[Rommel]

since I already have the money.........

I will never be in a relationship for money, and I am wary to use money in attracting attention

but I do believe that most teenagers & young adults get confused about love, but that does not mean that they don't necessarily know what love is (however there are some of them who just don't)                    

[snake_eater]

using ppl for money is wrong........................................                    

[shivadee]

If you talking flat out "goin out with someone because they have paper" well that just wrong. But really the person who getting "used" should know better as well eh, most of the time its easy to spot a "user", they just plain.......well EASY   . Money is necessary, but should be used with love, not on its own......like an expression. Kinda like what

• ~Kheulith is saying                    

[Zero-X]

well, as long as u love each other...the money is not an option but there are some ppl that do get in relationships for the money and money alone, and for this i have one thing to say...

the ppl who love for loving sake...have a true heart...
the ones who do not...are fickle and are concerned only with themselves and not you...                    

[Kheulith]

relationships are based on trust so the guy/girl wouldn't think u would actually used them so when i all comes down to it , it's bout what u think if u really got into those relationships for money or u loved them and they had money it's 2 diffent things                    

[Imperial_X]

You know, this thread reminds me of a skit on that Doctor Dre cd some time ago.                    

[Hinata]

relationships should be based on love and nothin else.........marriage on the other hand i think has to be based on money.                    

[Rommel]

marriage based on money?

stewps

that is why divorce is so high                    

[lunitare]

love or nothing                    

[lunitare]

marriage on money that jus spells divorce                    

[Fault]

I think what Hinata meant to say is that when you are going to marry someone a lot more concideration should be given to financial security than in any other level of a relatoinship.                    

[Greatis]

these are my few words. I would prefer entering a relationship for love, but love is hard to find. You see we as men have to learn to read our female counterparts. We need to be able to tell a money grabber from someone who is looking for a relationship.

I would not enter a relationship for money for a wide variety of reasons. The relationship more than likely will not last, the one with the money will more than likely become domineering and I could go on. I don't see the advantages of a monetary based relationship outwaying those of one based on love.                    

[Master-Baker]

Ah setta mc teeny boppers in here

What allyuh know
nutten                    

[Rommel]

yes but financial considerations MUST be secondary, to love..........

Hinata's statement  however almost definately stated the opposite, I say almost mind all of you....