Quotehmm.the americans have poisoned your mind to such a high level that you dont care whether innocents are killed in the capture of saddam.This americanist attitude will only lead to setbacks and the spilling of innocent bloodthat attitude you speak about, that fascist imperialistic capitalistic modus operandi, has been around for a long time. you dont have to be american to have it. they didn't make it up. the british and french were at it before there was a usa.i dont use american as a negative label as i know of many fine people from that countryso your blatant use of labels means 'they' win, you hate them, and they hate you. attituseds like that keep 'them' in business.its sad to see the extent to which history is learned today. no matter your opinions/ ideas of the conspiracies/agendas that unfold now, the fact remains. saddam was their boy, the reagan/bush administration/british put him in power, armed him and he commited atrocities enabled by them and at their behest. if the US should 'do' anything to him it should probably be to give him a gold watch and a retirement house for doing so much work for them.
hmm.the americans have poisoned your mind to such a high level that you dont care whether innocents are killed in the capture of saddam.This americanist attitude will only lead to setbacks and the spilling of innocent blood
Me aint care wat none of allyuh say... I know for sure that Saddam gettin a minimum sentence of 'life' cuz he goin and be tried by an american courtThere is no fairness when tried by an enemy.
What is going on is much deeper than what meets the eye. Sadaam has gone down. OK! We know this, but what about all of his loyal followers?
One question I don't think (I apologise if someone already answered this)anyone answered was if people afraid that since Sadaam has been captured that a group would strike back? I know Iraq does not have the strength to overpower the United Nations or even the United States for that matter, but what if Sadaam really does have weapons of mass destruction and they are deployed ( I know Sadaam is not a madman, who would go and do some kinda madness just. I'm just wondering if anybody else thought about this little scenario....)
And what about the Bin Laden factor? I think the United States is overrating him a little too much. IS he that big of a threat??!
Saddam is a bottom.They didnt have to know it was him but nooooo,he had to go like some gangsta man,my name is saddamn hussein...blah blah blah
QuoteWhat is going on is much deeper than what meets the eye. Sadaam has gone down. OK! We know this, but what about all of his loyal followers?WHAT loyal followers? Let's get something straight. Saddam needed a huge army within Iraq to keep the people in Iraq restrained. The Americans have less than 20% of the people Saddam had. Not many people are shedding tears for Saddam: at the same time, he may be a bastard and a bloodthirsty murderer, but he's an Iraqi bastard and bloodthirsty murderer. Everybody bitches about Saddam but fails to realize that he was better at providing the basics (water, electricity and education) than the American army has been.Unfortunately, the Americans are now finding out that there is nothing more scary than a man who is fighting for his country against oppressive foreigners.QuoteOne question I don't think (I apologise if someone already answered this)anyone answered was if people afraid that since Sadaam has been captured that a group would strike back? I know Iraq does not have the strength to overpower the United Nations or even the United States for that matter, but what if Sadaam really does have weapons of mass destruction and they are deployed ( I know Sadaam is not a madman, who would go and do some kinda madness just. I'm just wondering if anybody else thought about this little scenario....)SADDAM HAS NO WMDs and probably had none since the 1990s. Hans Blix and the UN looked for them for years and found none. The Americans were looking for them for months and found NONE. Saddam never shot down a US plane in the twelve years since the Gulf War, he's gonna get WMDs to the US? It's called bluffing.Don't believe the mainstream US media - they've done a piss-poor job of reporting the conflict. You get better news from the BBC.QuoteAnd what about the Bin Laden factor? I think the United States is overrating him a little too much. IS he that big of a threat??!The one thing that Saddam was NOT guilty of was in being in cahoots with Osama. Iraq was the last place that Osama would go to find fedayeen for his cause as the ayatollahs and mullahs had NO rank in Iraq. Remember, the people in the planes on september 11, 2001 were Saudis and Egyptians, both "friendly" countries, according to the US. No Iraqis. Remember also that the Carlyle Group has pretty strong links with the Bin Laden family as well (Google them)Osama needed constant kidney dialysis before he disappeared. He's probably dead, with his bones bleaching in the Afghan sun. Unfortunately, rabid ideology takes a loinger time to die. Please note the resurgence of the Taliban in Afghanistan with the US misadventure in Iraq.However, he's a convenient boogeyman for GWBush to use to get the neocon genda passed and adopted. Plus, US security is as bad as it has always been. After the success of GWBush's "Operation Piss on the World", there will be a lot less sympathy for the US this time around, if anything happens to Dubya.Now if you were to research that agenda, you'd crap yourself.
