Author Topic: Equilibrium (Read 22179 times)

BourbonNinja · « **Reply #80 on:** October 07, 2003, 05:51:14 PM »

Balance is the key does any body know the name of the guns used in the movie

Carigamers · « **Reply #80 on:** October 07, 2003, 05:51:14 PM »

clawz · « **Reply #81 on:** October 10, 2003, 05:03:44 PM »

BAD A$$ Movie !!!
This movie had the kinda action i like !!! :cool:

Kayode · « **Reply #82 on:** October 12, 2003, 11:10:52 AM »

Quote

ok goddess, i can see your in terest in jerry brukheimer, the dude who directed black hawk down.

Jerry Bruckheimer didn't direct Equilibrium or Black Hawk Down. Ridley Scott directed Black Hawk Down. Kurt Wimmer directed Equilibrium.

Kayode · « **Reply #83 on:** October 12, 2003, 11:16:44 AM »

I don't compare Equilibrium to Matrix. If I did, Matrix would easily blow away Equilibrium in terms of action, and Equilibrium would easily knock away Matrix in terms of storytelling.

The guy who made Equilibrium never intended for it to compete with Matrix. The movie as made for less than 20 million dollars. There is ONE action scene in Matrix that is longer than all of Equilibirum's action scenes combined. But some marketing exec come up with the comparison and have half of alyuh confused.

A beautiful story...particularly the scene in the dog pound.

I really loved Equilibrium though. One of the best movies I've seen all year.

Warrior · « **Reply #84 on:** November 04, 2003, 05:27:48 AM »

I think Equiblibrium is one of the greatest movies of all time.

No matter what people say I believe it was better than the Matrix anyday.

The fact that they did it on a lot smaller bubget than Matrix just shows the talent involved.

Carigamers · « **Reply #84 on:** November 04, 2003, 05:27:48 AM »

PapaSmurf · « **Reply #85 on:** November 04, 2003, 10:26:14 AM »

same can be said of Lord of the Rings of which the trilogy's cost was less than 2/3rds the cost of ONE matrix movie.

But it's unfair to compare them any further as the W brothers are piss in tail lil boys in the Literal world when compared to tolkien.

Kayode · « **Reply #86 on:** November 04, 2003, 02:18:52 PM »

Quote

same can be said of Lord of the Rings of which the trilogy's cost was less than 2/3rds the cost of ONE matrix movie.

But it's unfair to compare them any further as the W brothers are piss in tail lil boys in the Literal world when compared to tolkien.

All three LOTR movies cost a total of $100 million to produce? I doubt it. Where alyuh does get these figures?

I'm seeing the LOTR production costs (full trilogy) as between $300 and $350 million, and that doesn't include the cost of the reshoots for the second and third parts.

The original Matrix cost less than $100 million, and the two sequels cost around $300 million in total.

silenthunter · « **Reply #87 on:** November 05, 2003, 03:29:45 PM »

i hear it k but i have to see it first i know the star from shaft the killer christian bale

Chaos · « **Reply #88 on:** November 05, 2003, 05:29:36 PM »

The movie was good but CANNOT be compared to Matrix......That is in a class by itself.

silenthunter · « **Reply #89 on:** November 05, 2003, 08:34:24 PM »

this movie is like the matrix but far from it very bad

Carigamers · « **Reply #89 on:** November 05, 2003, 08:34:24 PM »

Author Topic: Equilibrium (Read 22179 times)

Carigamers

Carigamers

Carigamers

ShoutBox