Author Topic: The Abu Bakr Inquiry (Read 13055 times)

PapaSmurf · « **Reply #40 on:** March 13, 2005, 07:21:49 PM »

We'll know by this week....the jury has the case

Carigamers · « **Reply #40 on:** March 13, 2005, 07:21:49 PM »

Exar_Kun · « **Reply #41 on:** March 17, 2005, 06:34:34 PM »

I'm stunned.Really.
That three people actually held strong to their 'guilty' verdicts.I thought he'd get a full acquittal.
I guess Cassell will be sticking around for a while longer.

W1nTry · « **Reply #42 on:** March 18, 2005, 08:58:39 AM »

Now boys and girls show by raise of hands how many of u didn't see that this was NOT GOING ANY $#&INGWHERE but to waste our tax payers dollars to pay some high profile EXPENSIVE NO @$$ lawyer so he could make a mint off our sorry @$$es. *sighs*.... come on noone and I mean NOONE expected him to be convicted. As for the 3 guilty, I am sure thats arranged so the prosecution doh look TOO STUPID. Its ALL PR BS. BAKAS all of them. i say CHARGE them for being STUPID and WASTING OUR money.

Exar_Kun · « **Reply #43 on:** March 18, 2005, 05:18:47 PM »

I'd rather see a QC representing the state than some nobody fresh out of law school.
It's a high profile case,it requires high profile representation by the state.

When the US had Clinton,who was the number one?Ken ****ing Starr.

PapaSmurf · « **Reply #44 on:** March 18, 2005, 07:40:46 PM »

A mistrail isn't the same as an acquital

have some faith that justice will be done

Carigamers · « **Reply #44 on:** March 18, 2005, 07:40:46 PM »

Bourbon_Ghost · « **Reply #45 on:** March 19, 2005, 05:40:59 AM »

oh and i think the answer for for "nobody fresh out of law school. It's a high profile case,it requires high profile representation by the state" means just that they looking too get props and too stupid too realise what they be getting themselves into, thats my guess anyways

Carigamers · « **Reply #45 on:** March 19, 2005, 05:40:59 AM »

Author Topic: The Abu Bakr Inquiry (Read 13055 times)

Carigamers

Carigamers

Carigamers

ShoutBox