Author Topic: The Abu Bakr Inquiry (Read 13067 times)

Crixx_Creww · « **Reply #20 on:** February 10, 2005, 05:49:03 PM »

under all dis ole talk

i remember de days when dey used to flikkin hang for treason.

swing dat beatch from a tree of our choice.
My friends father was killed in the red house when they stormed to take uncle robby.
My boy never gotten over it an his family in a state ever since.

Swing dat beatch, charge admission we.
Curly, i respect yu for yu somewhat legendary status in gatt, buh yu being kinda unpatriotic about an issue that is pretty hard to fight down.
He duck justice before, and hopefully he will get it now.

I say we call in Daddy castro and let him take this flikkin dissadent off we hands.

Once again, swing dat beach.

Carigamers · « **Reply #20 on:** February 10, 2005, 05:49:03 PM »

PapaSmurf · « **Reply #21 on:** February 10, 2005, 09:37:31 PM »

I say we call in Daddy castro and let him take this flikkin dissadent off we hands.

A man after my own heart....lol
I fully agree with the Socialist sentiments Crixx. But I don't think the majority of the populace will be applicable to that discourse. As long as the desire for wealth is the driving force of humanity that is.

DeadEyes · « **Reply #22 on:** February 11, 2005, 09:36:16 AM »

well to be quite honest it was an act of treason, and last time i checked treason was punishable by death under her majesty's law. other than that i agree with the sentiments majorly expressed here that he will go free, and as papasmurf rightly said imo as long as the pursuit of money and power continues to be driving force of the populace, people like this will continue to be welcomed and a place made for them. But as curly said also, i don't agree with the admission thing
if he's gonna be hanged do it and get it over with, no gross public displays to feed the fury of the mob

PapaSmurf · « **Reply #23 on:** February 11, 2005, 09:47:53 PM »

punishable by death under her majesty's law

We achieved independence in 1962. In doing that we attempted to say "Her majesty and all her laws can kiss our @r$e". However we retained the Privy Council as our final appelate court and thus an arm of our state. In other words England and her Queen are telling us "You may be independent.....but I'm Rick James, B!TCH!"

Curly · « **Reply #24 on:** February 13, 2005, 04:50:06 PM »

Crixx - justice is not hanging a man in a public display, in the oval or putting a man out and letting the public throw rocks at him..... the days of that done.

that was my most serious objection.
In the past Mr. Man get off because our laws accomodate pardons etc. just like people does use the system to get what they want.... layers do it, doctors do it taxi drivers do it. everyone does it at some point or the other.

Everyone was upset after he terrorize the country and walk.... but anybody ever stand up and say... well hear what nah.... my family was done a great injustice in this thing... and I going to insist that they change the laws so it don't happen again.

Everybody continue bout life... government change laws stay the same, everybody just want they road pave before elections.

Now the man on trial and even thought you think he guilty the justice system allows him to be innocent until proven guilty, and I'm sure if you were in a court case and you were innocent you'd be glad to know that it's not about you trying to convince beyond a doubt that you innocent.
If the police did they job right the man will get sentance....

Carigamers · « **Reply #24 on:** February 13, 2005, 04:50:06 PM »

Gwb · « **Reply #25 on:** February 16, 2005, 09:19:19 AM »

u tink tha go stop true gangstas Like meh bwoy in GTA say

Groove street OG's 4 LiFE Homie!!!!!!!!

If u wanna stop d crime we needz 2 go bak to Islamic lawz. Choppin off man han an ting. Only den u go find tingz changin. Da is wha Uncle Abu wuz tryin to do. Just lookin out for u an me Thaz all

New Era Outlaw · « **Reply #26 on:** February 16, 2005, 07:36:19 PM »

Your 'Uncle Abu' also caused the deaths of several innocent civilians, cops just trying to do their jobs, people's livelihoods as well as A.N.R. Robinson's self-esteem. Oh, and let's not forget about the time 'Uncle Abu' took an entire TV station and all of the hard working people there hostage. Oh, and who could forget the time our favorite local terrorist 'Uncle Abu' placed a gun to the head of the then-Prime Minister, and forced a presidential pardon out of Mr. Hassanali? Did Uncle Aboo-boo tell you that? No? Probably because people like you have their heads so firmly shoved up this guy's rectum, that's WHY.

1990 will be a day that shall live forever in infamy, all because of 'Uncle Abu'. Long story short, if you want to stop crime, YOU DON'T DO S**T LIKE THIS IN THE FIRST PLACE AND TAKE THE LAW INTO YOUR OWN HANDS.

If you want to sympathise with a bona fide terrorist like Abu Bakr, that's all fine and dandy, peachy keen. You believe want you want to believe. Just don't come here and try to convince us otherwise. Not that you can, DUBYA, because, like your old account, this account is BANNED. Nice try.

PapaSmurf · « **Reply #27 on:** February 17, 2005, 09:55:24 PM »

Bwaahhahaaha

Oh yes Neo....that pic rel crack me up. This little newb is kicks oui.

orginalvexman · « **Reply #28 on:** February 19, 2005, 08:07:53 AM »

neo you a man songing like if the system bad u will stay with it and waut for somebody else to do it man just try to chnage the system innocent people will most of the time get catch in the cross fire of a revolution.

u going on like u would be vex with the army for trying to take over the country in 70's because the government was doing crap
up risings happen when people do crap the reason why abu fail cause he did not have the people support the reason why the 70 up rising fail because they blow up a bridge

New Era Outlaw · « **Reply #29 on:** February 19, 2005, 03:36:13 PM »

No. I did it because Dubya's acting like a moron.

Besides which, YOUR dad didn't lose his entire business in the coup, did he?

PapaSmurf · « **Reply #30 on:** February 20, 2005, 06:28:05 PM »

neo you a man songing like if the system bad u will stay with it and waut for somebody else to do it man just try to chnage the system innocent people will most of the time get catch in the cross fire of a revolution.

interesting perspective.....One man's terrorist is another's Freedom fighter...

Also accepted is the notion that much losses and violence must be endured during the onset of a revolution. And revolutions only happen when the masses are unbearingly unable to live in the old manner.

However, i question the motives of Abu Bakar in the 1990 coup attempt. I summise that it was more for his and the Jamaat Al muslimeen's benefit than for the rest of the nation. More self interest than national interest being displayed on his part. Thus, I don't think i would put him in the same category as Washington, Robspierre, Lenin, Castro & other revolutionaries. He's more at home with Kim JongII, Sadam Hussein, Robert Mugabe, R. Kelly etc

orginalvexman · « **Reply #31 on:** February 21, 2005, 06:36:12 AM »

Quote

Besides which, YOUR dad didn't lose his entire business in the coup, did he?

no he did not just car tire and rims but i am not going to be vex with the man and want him to die death is does be to easy a punishment for men who sometimes doh care. but if u want revenge so be it just be more blood shed later cause his people will want revenge then people like u who family get hurt will want revenge and it will just keep going on thats why there will really never be peace on this world

New Era Outlaw · « **Reply #32 on:** February 21, 2005, 06:49:10 AM »

True, but you have to admit that Abu Bakr has to pay, in one way or the other, for his crimes. There's absolutely no way a man like him should get off scot-free after what he and his band of men did.

orginalvexman · « **Reply #33 on:** February 21, 2005, 08:45:30 AM »

no he should not get away free he should pay back evrybody who he has destroyed physically and ementaly but it is unnlikely he put to much fear in to the goverment

Bourbon_Ghost · « **Reply #34 on:** February 23, 2005, 05:17:10 PM »

hmm... I find that last comment interesting why would u think, besides the obvious of course?

...and i do sympathise with Neo, but i agree with OVMan "an eye for an eye is not the way"

[P] Striker · « **Reply #35 on:** February 25, 2005, 01:11:13 PM »

maybe so

But when judging ppl of a certain religion, wouldn't it be proper to judge them by their own law too? eg, if they ketch u thiefin in El Socorro they chop off yr hand. Ewwwwww

Imagine what bakr will get for conspiracy to murder :-)

Bourbon_Ghost · « **Reply #36 on:** February 28, 2005, 10:28:49 AM »

^^^ good point eh Striker.... :sigh:

but seeing that these are the days of modern times and how laws
seldom help the "poor"

and the "rich" get off scott free who's
to say?

PapaSmurf · « **Reply #37 on:** March 01, 2005, 11:05:09 PM »

"The Poor are crazy, the rich are eccentric"

I believe that's what u are trying to say.

Rampage · « **Reply #38 on:** March 06, 2005, 10:20:18 AM »

Quote

"The Poor are crazy, the rich are eccentric"

I believe that's what u are trying to say.

indeed
can anyone give me an update on the status of this? he in jail yet?

Bourbon_Ghost · « **Reply #39 on:** March 12, 2005, 04:06:50 AM »

no he is not in jail...and i very much doubt that we will even be near one soon the way the "so-called investigator" handled stuff.

i mean he singled handl probaly lay waste to what would have been a hard evidence case...which unfortunately brings us to right where we started :sigh:

Carigamers · « **Reply #39 on:** March 12, 2005, 04:06:50 AM »

Author Topic: The Abu Bakr Inquiry (Read 13067 times)

Carigamers

Carigamers

Carigamers

ShoutBox