I, personally, don't care much for American politics, if it wasn't for the fact that America wasn't so influential on so many other countries (here included)...
Regardless of whether Bush was right or wrong for invading Iraq, he stands by his decision. He displays strength. I not getting into the right or wrong of the decision. Kerry wavers. He is unsure. He is weak !!
Pandering to public opinion is weak. It means one has no depth of character or strength to make a stand on something.
He made a decision and stood by it regardless of the outcome
You're making absolutely no sense whatsoever. Please..I urge you to think about what you're typing so we can move forward.
CNN says "jump beyotch" and you say "how high?"I have heard this argument a dozen times since the debate and its nexus is the Fox News post debate commentary, which was replayed again and again through the mouths of a dozen analysts all repeating the same phrase. Hell, you almost have the phrase exact....I don't disagree with your opinion or your right to hold an opinion. I mainly disagree with why you hold the opinion.
If his goal was to scare the the terrorist world or any would be America bombers (which IMO was the sole purpose of his heavy hand in Afganistan and Iraq)....hand it to the guy, he succeded !!
almost all terrorism is sponsored by middle-eastern govt's.
I just like that ignorant MoFo, Bush. He is just what the sponsors of terrorism need !!
Clinton managed to "scare" them away from 1993-2000 by bombing one airfield? Quote: almost all terrorism is sponsored by middle-eastern govt's. No. The majority of terrorism is funded by big Middle East businesses. The oil magnates. Like those in Saudi Arabia. Like those that Bush is in bed with. Quote: I just like that ignorant MoFo, Bush. He is just what the sponsors of terrorism need !! This definitely makes sense. The sponsors of terrorism need a reason to hate the Western World even more and despatch their boys wherever they can.
The reason there haven't been any acts of terrorism on the US mainland is because of the super-tight US security. Not because anyone is scared.
If the terrorists were scared of the US, you think they'd be beheading men left and right, and sending video of it right back to the US? You think they're be engaging the US forces in Iraq?
So saying that Bush's actions have "scared" terrorists away from the states doh make too much sense.
No. The majority of terrorism is funded by big Middle East businesses. The oil magnates. Like those in Saudi Arabia. Like those that Bush is in bed with.
Poor journalism !!!
NOBODY wants to be the country that is connected to the next American bombing, and that's because of BadMan Bush !!!
And there have been NO, such attacks ANYWHERE in the world since Bush's heavy hand. There have been NO major attacks WORLDWIDE !!!. And there were, before Bush went postal.
I personally think there's NOTHING one can do to stop terrorism. This has been proven consistently. No amount of security can stop it. But i tired....Anti-bush coalition....take win.
I personally think there's NOTHING one can do to stop terrorism. This has been proven consistently. No amount of security can stop it.