Author Topic: halo combat evolved mp Vs. bf1942 (Read 7292 times)

nytemare · « **on:** September 30, 2003, 03:51:26 PM »

pick one
the comparison refers to multiplayer halo pc NOT XBOX.

Carigamers · « **on:** September 30, 2003, 03:51:26 PM »

hiddenagenda · « **Reply #1 on:** September 30, 2003, 04:59:31 PM »

steups
NO comparison once again....
have you even PLAYED these 2 games for pc?

androsovic · « **Reply #2 on:** September 30, 2003, 05:15:30 PM »

u know...one dumb mc

Set · « **Reply #3 on:** September 30, 2003, 08:20:56 PM »

i just hope d ppl who vote play both and not voting because dey find thier game is d best no matter what

polls cud real get mess up dat way

but on other notes...
i find BF better

Osiris · « **Reply #4 on:** September 30, 2003, 08:30:59 PM »

ok man if i had to choose is BF but they are exactly as ppl said two diff games

Carigamers · « **Reply #4 on:** September 30, 2003, 08:30:59 PM »

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #5 on:** October 01, 2003, 07:49:15 AM »

What's wrong with you hidden?

Both games are FPS
both games allow you to drive and fly vehicles
Both games are multiplayer

Sounds like a perfect match up to me.

Personally, I love both....but I will give Halo the nodge because

1) I love Sci Fi stuff
2) Halo has much better Player vs Player combat

In BF1942 when two guys clash in a gun fight, it feels a bit shallow, flaky.

nytemare · « **Reply #6 on:** October 01, 2003, 09:47:37 AM »

baego has found the essence of the poll, it is a good match, if you don't think so just look at the multiplaye aspect of both games.

SIRblackice · « **Reply #7 on:** October 01, 2003, 10:18:57 AM »

no but for real i was gonna ask why is 2 differnt games ??
but i real don't like the man to man combat in bf i mean is a good game but a gun battle close up is kinda lame. but i guess in that era war was fought from a distance

Saitou · « **Reply #8 on:** October 01, 2003, 10:27:27 AM »

i wwould have to vote 4 bf cause it more realistic but i like halo cause they have reall BIG GUNS
LOL

PapaSmurf · « **Reply #9 on:** October 01, 2003, 10:39:12 AM »

This isn't a bad poll really, good comparison between 2 popular fps multiplayer titles.

But i would give Bf1942 thew thumbs up, especially if we talkign about the Desert combat mod, due to the realism of the battlesequences and the general cohesiveness in gameplay. Plus there's the fact that a Battlefield player is more empowered by the game to perform certain functions and thus be able to come up with more and diverse strategies. Halo is alot more linmited than BF, and the vehicle choice is alot wider than Halo's 4 machine system.

So i guess Bf1942 whoops Halo @rse good and proper.

QDizzle · « **Reply #10 on:** October 01, 2003, 11:25:03 AM »

Quote

u know...one dumb mc

ent hoss

ask a stupid question get a stupid answer hoss Rise of Nations

what do these games have in common anyway nytmare jus spammin as usual yes

androsovic · « **Reply #11 on:** October 01, 2003, 01:52:56 PM »

yea that rell cool.i think i running a halo sweat thursday in hq with me amigos,allyuh rope in nah

(P)_zappreX · « **Reply #12 on:** October 04, 2003, 02:17:31 PM »

battlefield will beat halo any day

[X]-Badboyb · « **Reply #13 on:** October 04, 2003, 02:54:37 PM »

i perfered BF1942 or DC because it have more acton

Set · « **Reply #14 on:** October 04, 2003, 06:24:06 PM »

BF betta dan halo for me.........but not by a whole lot
i still have rel respect for halo

Ninja644 · « **Reply #15 on:** October 04, 2003, 08:00:05 PM »

In my opinion, Halo OWNZ BF on d pc. Cuz is like Baego say, man to man combat does be kinda crappy in BF, but in Halo....whooooo, u runnin down a man wit yuh hand gun and he have a rocket launcher in he hand. Now dat iz dreadness....

zaibatsu · « **Reply #16 on:** November 29, 2003, 06:07:43 PM »

Absolutley not. There is no comparison. I am dismissing halo. It cannot compare to battlefield. The game is just too perfect on too many counts. Hard luck. Some support twister?

Xen_spartan-117 · « **Reply #17 on:** November 30, 2003, 01:31:58 PM »

well the population of game players play halo(xbox) rather than pc
besides the majority of people who LOVE to use vehicles and kill people from far range... are normally bf 1942 players....ALTHOUGH battlefield 1942 is good and gives a wider variety of vehicles...halo requires a MUCH HIGHER understanding of first person physics...as well you can be proud when you gunbut someone in the face ^^

Xen_spartan-117 · « **Reply #18 on:** November 30, 2003, 01:45:37 PM »

the guys with rookie levels.. saying bf1942 dreader than halo...well...thats what shall always be...

mangoseed_89 · « **Reply #19 on:** November 30, 2003, 03:16:08 PM »

i choose bf because its more realistic
those are the type of games i like
what halo lacks is the functions of its contents
flying in halo is much easier than in battlefield
which is one of its weaker points
all in all its a close match up
but battlefield got the edge because of better realism

Carigamers · « **Reply #19 on:** November 30, 2003, 03:16:08 PM »

Poll

who do you vote for

Author Topic: halo combat evolved mp Vs. bf1942 (Read 7292 times)

Carigamers

Carigamers

Carigamers

ShoutBox