Author Topic: Seecarr11 Benchmarks (Read 7494 times)

seecarr11 · « **on:** August 27, 2007, 11:40:46 PM »

My First attempt at benchmarking

WASD: you were right. I should have done this when i had the FX60. Maybe later i'll overclock and see what numbers i can get

As soon as I get the rest of the benchmarking software i will finish this post

Carigamers · « **on:** August 27, 2007, 11:40:46 PM »

Arcmanov · « **Reply #1 on:** August 28, 2007, 12:06:42 AM »

Impressive. At stock speed too. I would have to OC the snot out of my e6600 just to break 10K in 3DMark06.

I guess I've been pwned again.

The power of quad-core eh.....

Crixx_Creww · « **Reply #2 on:** August 28, 2007, 12:46:32 AM »

nice score indeed

expected an oc off the bat
and those ram timings suck

do something bout yuh ram when yuh ocing.

Spazosaurus · « **Reply #3 on:** August 28, 2007, 04:08:28 AM »

Why go quad and bottleneck it with (by today's standard) sub par 667 ram. 800mhz should be your baseline speed.

@ Arc. 2 spots down in 5 days? I'm sure youre smelling an upgrade

Netizen1 · « **Reply #4 on:** August 28, 2007, 09:03:15 AM »

What better timings can you expect from DDR2 ram?

I know one should try to use 1T Command Rate. But what else should be the aim for RAM timings...

EDIT: I just saw some 3-3-3-10 memory, but it was only DDR2 667

DDR2 800 memory has speeds like 4-4-4-12

Carigamers · « **Reply #4 on:** August 28, 2007, 09:03:15 AM »

Arcmanov · « **Reply #5 on:** August 28, 2007, 12:18:08 PM »

You can get DDR2-800 RAM with CL4 timings, but it a tad pricier than the CL5.

At least, at the time it was. Now its just a few dollars more.

Saxito Pau · « **Reply #6 on:** August 28, 2007, 12:24:41 PM »

Good lord I must've dropped to 14th or something now (somebody please make an official update of the rankings thread before the weekend is out!)....

I'm definitely ordering an X2 6000+ this week, followed by level OC in that biatch with my-most-powerful-HSF-on-GATT... and I just fiddled with atitool this morning...

Prowl · « **Reply #7 on:** August 28, 2007, 02:22:25 PM »

OMFG!!!!!

I ordering a Q6600!!! G0 stepping tho lol!

just for the record the Q6600 can easily oc to 3.2ghz in our temps on air! and as for the ram timmings 4-5-4-15 ddr2 800 is a good compromise over 4-4-4-12 ram price wise.

Ya Sax man you and me both may not be on the top 10 after saturday lol!

Spazosaurus · « **Reply #8 on:** August 29, 2007, 09:26:30 AM »

seecarr11, put your benchmark results in the main benchmark summary thread please.

seecarr11 · « **Reply #9 on:** September 01, 2007, 09:55:58 PM »

Using the ai booster software (being too lazy to fiddle with the bios myself) and the stock hs & fan,
i did a 20% over clock

q6600 @ 2.875 GHz
GPU 8800 gts @ 580 & 900 (stock)
RAM at 799

3dmark 06 :- 11872

Results in the pic, will try to cross 12k later

Nephilim · « **Reply #10 on:** September 01, 2007, 10:04:50 PM »

dred doh even bother i think yuh have the top spot now...

http://gatt.carigamers.com/index.php/topic,11784.0.html

by a cool 400 pts...

id just like to add i hate you all...

anyone want a kidney to buy...

Arcmanov · « **Reply #11 on:** September 01, 2007, 10:12:40 PM »

lol...well, a quad-core will do that, but doh study it, we shall all bask in quad-core goodness soon...

Spazosaurus · « **Reply #12 on:** September 01, 2007, 10:25:54 PM »

Hmmm i'm pwnt already? F*$k yo score n1gg@, f$&k your score!!

Arcmanov · « **Reply #13 on:** September 01, 2007, 10:30:09 PM »

Crixx_Creww · « **Reply #14 on:** September 01, 2007, 10:40:27 PM »

stomp on yo score N*** lol

seecarr11 · « **Reply #15 on:** September 02, 2007, 12:19:53 AM »

Over clocking nowadays seems to be only about getting the highest synthetic score. I guess that isn't too bad after hearing arcman's point, but personally, i think it was supposed to be buying the cheapest (or most cost effective) CPU and getting it to run with the big dogs. That is what "Unknown" did. 75% and stable on air is amazing. That's what its about so big respect to you son. You could teach me a few tricks and we'll see how far this thing can go as a group. a Real team effort if you will. Perhaps we should add a category that also judges the percentage increase and cost savings as opposed to the 3dmark, meaning unknown is still the current champ.

If could do 75% with this (which is impossible without some elaborate cooling contraption) just think of the possibilities.

Don't hate, Congratulate

12k mark crossed and

and i toned it down a bit arc, my bad

Arcmanov · « **Reply #16 on:** September 02, 2007, 01:48:13 AM »

That said, you STILL went and bought a quad-core CPU. Your tone is somewhat condescending.

As more powerful parts become
cheaper, we want that. Quad-core CPUs used to cost upwards of $1000 US, so now they're affordable, so that kinda puts your 'most cost effective' argument in perspective eh.
Quad-core is now VERY cost effective. More and more apps being created are now multi-threaded, including the very 3DMark06.

Of COURSE its about high scores dammit. Thats the reason we OC to begin with. Futuremark has a website dedicated to this,
and please don't take our comments literally. Its geniune appreciation, so just accept it and chill.

Oh yeah, and good job. Your rig is truly 'Crysis-worthy'.

seecarr11 · « **Reply #17 on:** September 02, 2007, 05:00:45 AM »

Nah Arc, that wasn't my intention. if it came across like that, my apologies to u and everybody else . I just felt that anybody with a big enough wallet can make a high score but what you and the other guys achieve requires true skill and u should get the respect. I will choose my words more carefully next time.

. And thanks.

Spazosaurus · « **Reply #18 on:** September 02, 2007, 07:59:49 AM »

You know, I was checking some dude's scores online with the q6600 and 8800gts combination and their results were similar to what seecarr's getting. It really makes you wonder just how much power these 8800's really have. When done right, they actually beat the 8800gtx!!! Good stuff. Btw do you have the 320 or 640mb version? I cant remember if you saaid it already but what clocks have you gotten it to run at?

About the e4400, its overclockability is truly amazing. In the era of the Mobile Athlon cpu where I used to get 5/600 mhz overclock, I was amazed then. But THIS chip is just...hmmm. But against a chip with twice the cores, it cant hold a candle when it comes to multithreaded performance. My next build will most definately include a quad.

seecarr11 · « **Reply #19 on:** December 16, 2007, 06:55:14 PM »

Follow Up

Just finished the first half of my upgrade. Arcman, you set an impressive standard. its gonna be hard to beat with a B3 stepping on air but it would be interesting to see just how far i can go

first run

Carigamers · « **Reply #19 on:** December 16, 2007, 06:55:14 PM »

Author Topic: Seecarr11 Benchmarks (Read 7494 times)

seecarr11

Carigamers

Carigamers

seecarr11

seecarr11

seecarr11

seecarr11

Carigamers

ShoutBox