Author Topic: Benchmark Thread of yesteryear (Read 56832 times)

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #100 on:** October 22, 2006, 02:39:17 PM »

Nice update Prowl.

Impressive figures. Where did you see Beomagi's? I must have missed it in this thread??

Carigamers · « **Reply #100 on:** October 22, 2006, 02:39:17 PM »

.:Jedi:. · « **Reply #101 on:** October 28, 2006, 02:43:36 AM »

Ok if u insist

....

Thats with my new 7900GTO @722/1630. I'll play around with the clocks some more and update as needed.....

DAMN my 06 cpu score sucks!!! dual core on the way tho....

Edit:

AMD Athlon64 4000+ @2.8GHz
2GB DDR (4x512) Kingston Hyper-X
Abit FATAL1TY AN8
eVGA 7900GTO @722/1630
320GB 7200.10 Barracuda HDD

3Dmark 2005: 10598
3Dmark 2006: 6106

Prowl · « **Reply #102 on:** October 28, 2006, 04:15:52 AM »

DAMN!

I had to pull some oc magic to pull this off, could have sworn my card was gonna melt! that 7900gto is still ubber, it's my e6600 that pulled my scores up.

TrinireturnofGamez · « **Reply #103 on:** October 28, 2006, 10:03:56 AM »

Prowl brave yes... that x1900gt must have been crying @ 650mhz core at least

.:Jedi:. · « **Reply #104 on:** October 28, 2006, 01:07:12 PM »

check dah cpu score!!! oh gaad meh cpu is mess!! nice score there prowl!!

Carigamers · « **Reply #104 on:** October 28, 2006, 01:07:12 PM »

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #105 on:** October 28, 2006, 02:19:13 PM »

whoa! that's an awesome score Jedi.

one thing, could you post the update with the standard benchmark format for this thread as well as the 3dmark pic?

makes it easy for tabulating on the front page and for seeing the specs of your machine at a glance.

Example:

Czar:
****
AMD 64 3500+ stock
DFI LANParty nF4 Ultra-D
eVGA 256MB 7800GT CO
2GB OCZ PC3200

3dmark 2001 23120
3dmark 2003 15490
3dmark 2005 7367

.:Jedi:. · « **Reply #106 on:** October 28, 2006, 04:18:20 PM »

updated....

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #107 on:** October 28, 2006, 11:12:45 PM »

nice specs.

That GTO card is awesome.

.:Jedi:. · « **Reply #108 on:** October 28, 2006, 11:29:43 PM »

yeah boy. i real glad to get it b4 all done! these clocks i have here are a couple MHz over the autodetect. I know it can go further. I need a better PSU tho....

W1nTry · « **Reply #109 on:** October 30, 2006, 01:21:57 PM »

Quote from: .:Jedi:. on October 28, 2006, 11:29:43 PM

yeah boy. i real glad to get it b4 all done! these clocks i have here are a couple MHz over the autodetect. I know it can go further. I need a better PSU tho....

Yeah yuh just keep RUBBING that in eh!!! feh

.:Jedi:. · « **Reply #110 on:** October 30, 2006, 08:21:47 PM »

couldnt help it man......sorry.....

Arcmanov · « **Reply #111 on:** October 31, 2006, 10:20:12 PM »

Of course the FIRST thing I had to do with mih new 7900GS was to fling it
through some benchies.

Quite a respectable improvement.

AMD Athlon64 3500+ @ 2.3 Ghz
MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum
BFG 7900GS OC (256 Mb)
2 Gb Corsair XMS PC3200 (2x1024 Mb)

3DMark2005 - 7718
3DMark2006 - 4896

Fling up a top 10 list nah Baego?
Ah sure I in dey somewhere.

The_Wickerman · « **Reply #112 on:** November 01, 2006, 05:23:01 PM »

AMD Athlon64 3700+ (San Diego)1MB L2 Cache @ stock
MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum
BFG 7900GS OC 256 Mb stock @ 540/1360MHz
1 Corsair 1GB DDR400 PC3200 CAS3 Valueram
Antec SmartPower 2.0 500W

i should get better scores when i get dual channel ram

Arcmanov · « **Reply #113 on:** December 09, 2006, 08:32:00 PM »

NEW Athlon 64 X2 3800 immc!!!
More benchies again.

Benchmarks were run at 1024 x 768

AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800 @ 2.0 Ghz (stock)
MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum
BFG 7900GS OC 256 MB @ 540/1320 (stock)
2 GB Corsair XMS PC3200 (2x1024 Mb)

3DMark2005 - 8192
3DMark2006 - 5393

Some minor OC'ing should result in a nice lil improvement again.

Crixx_Creww · « **Reply #114 on:** December 09, 2006, 08:52:08 PM »

hmmm
so from what i seeing of arcs set up

the 7900gs is a bonafide beast

Arcmanov · « **Reply #115 on:** December 09, 2006, 09:22:50 PM »

Yep, if you watch the progression of my hardware upgrades, you will notice the biggest jump in performance is when I got this 7900GS.

It overclocks nicely as well, even though its overclocked from the reference design by BFG already, but for long term I prefer not to do it.

Prowl · « **Reply #116 on:** December 10, 2006, 01:57:03 AM »

I noticed you were running 3dmark06 in 1024x768, Mine was run in 1280x1024 ( default ) retry it at that rez to compare since my 05 was over 10,000 and my 06 was 6,000 when run at defaults ( oc'ed to hell tho. ).

Arcmanov · « **Reply #117 on:** December 10, 2006, 03:50:16 AM »

My monitor cannot even DISPLAY that res, so I wont even bother with 1280 x 1024 until I get an LCD.

I play games at 1024x768 anyway. Anything higher than that will impede frame rates, even
with this card. At that res I can enable all the 'eye candy' settings and still maintain a smooth frame rate.

1280 x 1024 is playin 'biggish'.

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #118 on:** December 10, 2006, 10:18:06 AM »

what monitor is that Arc?

Find it hard to believe it can't do 1280x1024

We had a bunch of AOC monitors that failed to do the res until we installed the correct monitor driver (imagine that, installing monitor drivers, lol)

Arcmanov · « **Reply #119 on:** December 11, 2006, 12:07:56 AM »

Its a 15-inch AOC, black and silver. Don't know the model.
If I try that res the screen goes off and I get an 'OUT OF RANGE'
error on the screen.

So that out.

Carigamers · « **Reply #119 on:** December 11, 2006, 12:07:56 AM »

Author Topic: Benchmark Thread of yesteryear (Read 56832 times)

Carigamers

Carigamers

Carigamers

ShoutBox