Author Topic: Benchmark Thread of yesteryear (Read 56334 times)

Prowl · « **Reply #140 on:** January 24, 2007, 02:53:49 PM »

HUMM,

I got a 1900gt to hold me over till dx10, I am ready for the next gen, you are so not!

MUHAHAHAHAAHA

Carigamers · « **Reply #140 on:** January 24, 2007, 02:53:49 PM »

Beomagi · « **Reply #141 on:** January 24, 2007, 02:58:31 PM »

why do you believe that? the 4400+ stock isnt slow by any means, and most games today still are far far more reliant on the gpu than cpu.

W1nTry · « **Reply #142 on:** January 24, 2007, 03:15:07 PM »

Quote from: Beomagi on January 24, 2007, 02:58:31 PM

why do you believe that? the 4400+ stock isnt slow by any means, and most games today still are far far more reliant on the gpu than cpu.

Yuh know? these men, intel gone to they head :p I still sweating games as good as if not better than him :p (and it didn't cost me as much I sure)

Arcmanov · « **Reply #143 on:** January 24, 2007, 05:05:32 PM »

New rig?

Details man, details.......

Prowl · « **Reply #144 on:** January 24, 2007, 05:42:29 PM »

but I don't only play games!

Carigamers · « **Reply #144 on:** January 24, 2007, 05:42:29 PM »

Beomagi · « **Reply #145 on:** January 24, 2007, 05:47:44 PM »

Quote from: Prowl on January 24, 2007, 05:42:29 PM

but I don't only play games!

which is the only thing going to need that next gen dx10.

W1nTry · « **Reply #146 on:** January 25, 2007, 09:54:13 AM »

It just occur to me that prowl 3DMark score has his processor @ 3.4GHz... which means his actual score at STOCK is lower. Prowl run a bench on your system at STOCK and lewwe see the scores nah? man dissing my rig and eh give no base performance number bwtmc :p

Prowl · « **Reply #147 on:** January 25, 2007, 04:45:14 PM »

actually 3.24, I'll run it for you again @ 2.4 and let ya see. The cpu scores slighty increase the 3dmark results. @ stock cpu not OCing the board I might end up a tad lower than your score due to my card -25% to yours, it's a GT!

Arcmanov · « **Reply #148 on:** January 25, 2007, 05:44:35 PM »

Ay W1n. List the new system specs nah?

W1nTry · « **Reply #149 on:** January 25, 2007, 10:19:18 PM »

Just check meh benchmark thread arc. And its more of updated rig than new.
http://gatt.carigamers.com/index.php/topic,5808.msg148158.html#new

Arcmanov · « **Reply #150 on:** March 23, 2007, 11:57:12 PM »

Well folks, check the new benchies with my spankin new, BLAZING FAST, 8800 GTS:

3DMark05: 10566

3DMark06: 6937

Of course, run at stock speed: 550Mhz core/1300Mhz memory

Just goes to show the raw power of the 8800 series.
Mind you, this is on my current Athlon 64 X2 3800 rig eh.

I can't WAIT to see what will be the result when paired with the Intel Core 2 Duo E6600.

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #151 on:** March 24, 2007, 05:45:08 PM »

wow.

Now that is impressive.

Quite a bit of benchmarks posted since the last tally up.

Looks like we going to have a big shake up in the top 10 now.

I see even RB making a run with his DELL XPS.

Arcmanov · « **Reply #152 on:** March 30, 2007, 02:53:53 PM »

Now just LOOK AT THIS S#!T:

Oh my STARS AND GARTERS!!! O_O

3D Mark 05 = 13278

3D Mark 06 = 8630

The new system is offially on and POPPIN folks.

Asus P5W DH deluxe motherboard
Intel E6600 Conroe CPU @ 2.4 GHz (cooled by a Zalman CNPS9500 HSF)
BFG 8800 GTS OC video-card @ 540 MHz core/1300 MHz memory
2 BG Corsair XMS2 DDR2-800 RAM (1024 x 2)
Ultra XVs 700 Watt PSU

Not a bad way to spend $9500 eh

Let the pwnage begin....

syncrod · « **Reply #153 on:** March 31, 2007, 02:25:43 PM »

3D Mark 06 = 702

SM2.0 = 277
HDR = 211
CPU = 1817

daniboy79 · « **Reply #154 on:** March 31, 2007, 03:35:55 PM »

Quote from: Arcman on March 30, 2007, 02:53:53 PM

Now just LOOK AT THIS S#!T:

Oh my STARS AND GARTERS!!! O_O

3D Mark 05 = 13278

3D Mark 06 = 8630

The new system is offially on and POPPIN folks.

Asus P5W DH deluxe motherboard
Intel E6600 Conroe CPU @ 2.4 GHz (cooled by a Zalman CNPS9500 HSF)
BFG 8800 GTS OC video-card @ 540 MHz core/1300 MHz memory
2 BG Corsair XMS2 DDR2-800 RAM (1024 x 2)
Ultra XVs 700 Watt PSU

Not a bad way to spend $9500 eh

Let the pwnage begin....

no hatin Arc... you MUST have a Loving Wife/GF!! ...Lol, i'd HAVE to hide to spend like dat

Netizen1 · « **Reply #155 on:** March 31, 2007, 03:48:16 PM »

Quote from: syncrod on March 31, 2007, 02:25:43 PM

3D Mark 06 = 702

SM2.0 = 277
HDR = 211
CPU = 1817

hoss, that 7300 real holding you back...

* Voyd imitates Neo, "Hmmm, upgrades..."

syncrod · « **Reply #156 on:** March 31, 2007, 04:12:28 PM »

yeah when the money tree start to bear fruits i got step up.
maybe ah 8800 gts 320mb

Eroo · « **Reply #157 on:** April 02, 2007, 09:36:40 PM »

ok is not killer scores but still good IMO. The ram and processor holding me back. Looking to change to core 2 duo and 2GB ram but not for 2 months.

Athlon X2 4200
Biostar AM2NF6G
1GB PC533 DDR2 RAM
RAID 0 (2x80GB Seagate SATA II HD)
BFG Geforce 8800 GTS 320MB OC2 PCIe

3DMark 03 Settings
Resolution: 1024x768
Anitaliasing: None
Texture Filtering Optimal
Max Anistrophy 4
Vertex Shaders Optimal
Repeat Test Off
Fixed Framerate Off

Score – 26797

3DMark 05 Settings
Resolution: 1024x768
Anitaliasing: None
Filtering Optimal
HLSL VS Target 3_0
HLSL PS Target 3_0
Fixed Framerate Off
Score - 12056

Netizen1 · « **Reply #158 on:** April 02, 2007, 10:10:08 PM »

And where're your 3d Mark 2006 scores?

Everyone mostly using 2005 & 2006 to post these days... so update quick sharp

Eroo · « **Reply #159 on:** April 03, 2007, 07:09:32 PM »

Sorry, didn't have it. I only just downloaded it. Here are the results

Athlon X2 4200
Biostar AM2NF6G
1GB PC533 DDR2 RAM
RAID 0 (2x80GB Seagate SATA II HD)
BFG Geforce 8800 GTS 320MB OC2 PCIe

3DMark 06 Settings
Resolution: 1280x1024
Anitaliasing: None
Filtering Optimal
HLSL VS Target 3_0
HLSL PS Target 3_0
Fixed Framerate Off

Score – 8008

As you can see my cpu is holding me back. I've been a big AMD fan for years but the core2duo benchmarks really speak for themselves.

Carigamers · « **Reply #159 on:** April 03, 2007, 07:09:32 PM »

Author Topic: Benchmark Thread of yesteryear (Read 56334 times)

Carigamers

Carigamers

Carigamers

ShoutBox