AMD unleashes the A64 FX-55 and 4000+

[Czar]

A64 FX-55 and 4000+ --> http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2249

Still reading this one atm myself. A nice read tho


nForce4 --> http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2248

Looks to be the chipset for the A64 platform...not to mention they've gone and added in SLI to the picture

Interesting times                    

[DeadEyes]

already? damn, that means i hadda get a new pc already to have a best system...                      

[TrinireturnofGamez]

Don't forget support for SATA II Raids! 3Gb/s transfer! thats faster than most RAM!                      

[Czar]

Don't forget support for SATA II Raids!

I didn't wanna drop all the details...leave a lil bit for them to read themselves                    

[PsiVal]

ok...ppl we gotta overhaul pcs again...damn it...
P.S.-trini rather hear it from other ppl than read,cause u might understand it better from someone elses mouth than when u read it.                    

[cereal_killer]

it lookin real bad looks like i will most likely buy this in the future instead of a amd 64 xp 3200
wonder when intel will come out with there new 64 bit processor                    

[DeadEyes]

it comin soon hoss, it in the makin already the intel 64, u know they don't stick                    

[coldstorm]

when windows xp 64 bit come through u will see the real power of 64 bit cpus here check the link out
64 bit vs 32 bit                    

[cereal_killer]

i jus wanna see which better so i doh make de mistake of backin up de wrong 64 bit company                      

[unforgiven]

damn these things comming out real fast i just bought my cpu 3000 athlon                    

[Nitrate]

Bultiin Hardware Firewall into nforce4 board, w00t. Gonna like phreaking it.                    

[W1nTry]

The 4000+ is a strange product by @MD, they took a FX-53 and locked the multiplier and renamed it a 4000+ what was up with that anyways? its a 2.4GHz chip with 1MB L2 cache.... the FX-53 has the same specs save and except the unlocked multiplier.... they could have AT LEAST made a 2.6GHz 512Kb L2 and name it 4000+ (which they very well could yuh never know these days)                    

[coldstorm]

the reason they made the fx-53 the 4000 was becuase they were getting excellent yields with the chip so why bother to make something new when a previously higher rated product built at lower cost will do cuase the fx-53 outperform the 3800 so why not make the fx-53 the 4000 if yield were very good ?