So lets break it down a bit...(que Marky Mark...ok no)http://kotaku.com/5836803/how-modern-warfare-3-changes-the-call-of-duty-multiplayer-game-yet-again
On the opposite side of the fence, bfbc2 take too much time and I like to drop in a sweat, get in get out... I like both but COD gives a faster turnaround and I like it for that. When I want slower, larger scale, etc i'll drop in the bf or hell Skyrim when it drops. I have to ask though, exactly what will BF3 do differently in terms of gameplay than its excellent predecessors didn't? I am GOING to have both but I have yet to hear what (other than gorgeous graphics) BF3 is going to do to 'revolutionize' the FPS experience? You have a gun, vehicle, it's an FPS... they giving you a 3D headset to play the game? they giving you a ticket to a warzone to feel real bullets tear through your flesh? exactly what in ANY FPS in the past 3 years was 'revolutionary' versus 'Evolutionary' ?COD is building on what they know and making it better, how is BF3 doing anything different? aren't they not BOTH trying to improve our experience?
ctrl-c,ctrl-v that's awesome i love copy paste games.
ok to point out what W1n said earlier what exactly is BF doin new besides graphics?BF is doin BF and cod is doin cod, neither are doing anything new or revolutionary lets be real on that. BF has always been about infantry and vehicles while cod is infantry and air support.2 different games ppli think yall want cod to be more BF when that isnt gonna happen.If ur looking for a game that actually doing something new then look at DUST 514 /shameless plug