why do people get so worked up on resolution when playing the game supposed to be fun and enjoyable...the game not there to sit in front your eyes so you can wander around and admire how real it looks, when you can easily just go outside and get the ultimate HD experience by going out in nature instead of sitting in front the TV or PC Monitor with 1900 x 1200 pixels...come nah man, resolution is meaningless when all you want to do is have a good gaming session..When playing on a console, it looks good! when playing on PC it looks good! resolution comparison is taking things a bit far. The game working good? yes? so why complain about it? Nit picking just prevents you from having a good time...
600p.... is that even a resolution? not self 720p which is upscallable to 1080i? Cause then i'd expect noticeable pixellation like in Halo 3 which is not 720p native....
Quote from: W1nTry on October 19, 2009, 10:59:27 AM600p.... is that even a resolution? not self 720p which is upscallable to 1080i? Cause then i'd expect noticeable pixellation like in Halo 3 which is not 720p native....You'd be surprised at some of the resolutions games run at on console. Take Tekken 6 for example, the PS3 version is running at 1024×576 resolution with 2xAA and the 360 is version running at 1366×768 with no AA.
while with some effort, I can cut halo the slack for graphics (had a blast with halo 1 on the original xbox on a 27" CRT TV), I can't see myself doing the same with COD. Need the hi res to see Arcman crouching in the bushes from a distance.
maybe ODST giving other 360 games a bad name, lollike I said, will triple check my setup on wednesday, maybe I'm runnin in SD mode and don't know it. PS3 graphics looks MUCH better in 1080p mode (Tekken 5 DR) than the 360 does (ODST)