By todays standards is Duke Nukem really revolutionary or as kick ass as it was back in the day? I just dont understand the big hype over Duke Nukem still.
Quote from: Eroo on June 06, 2008, 01:13:34 PMBy todays standards is Duke Nukem really revolutionary or as kick ass as it was back in the day? I just dont understand the big hype over Duke Nukem still.This
Duke Nukem was the Chuck Noriss of First Person Shooters. The PC's answer to Nintendo's Golden Eye.The penultimate multiplayer experience of its time. FPS at its finest, hard core, gritty and innovative. The weapons were vicious, the gameplay, frenetic.Now we have Gears of War, Crysis, Serious Sam, Battlefield Bad Company 2, Borderlands and new comers like Blink on the horizon.A lot of strong contenders to the throne, but there is no doubt...that the throne belonged to the Duke.Honestly, I hope he reclaims it.
Isn't battlefield bad company 2 a multiplayer fps that's on all the consoles?That didn't suck now did it?LolNo love for the duke yes.
well to be fair, there are a lot of straight PC games with more bugs than Battlefield