Author Topic: GATT Members' Top Rigs (3DMark06) (Read 148740 times)

W1nTry · « **Reply #60 on:** January 25, 2008, 10:23:26 AM »

Well once you have the spare time on your hands, by all means, go for it.

Carigamers · « **Reply #60 on:** January 25, 2008, 10:23:26 AM »

Redlum08 · « **Reply #61 on:** February 10, 2008, 03:52:24 AM »

I want to see Shivadee's 3Dmarks Score, since that was the exact machine I was planning to build, I want to know what it is I have to BEAT!

Shiv! post your Benchies!! Mr. QX9650!

Philosophical45 · « **Reply #62 on:** February 10, 2008, 12:53:11 PM »

Quote from: Redlum08 on February 10, 2008, 03:52:24 AM

I want to see Shivadee's 3Dmarks Score, since that was the exact machine I was planning to build, I want to know what it is I have to BEAT!

Shiv! post your Benchies!! Mr. QX9650!

i second that. watchin those specs.. that machine must have some killer scores..

Arcmanov · « **Reply #63 on:** February 10, 2008, 02:39:24 PM »

Oh I THIRD that biatch!!! That rig is tha BIZNESSS!!!

Dare I say, the new 'kaing round here'?

Is a benchmark even necessary? Even in Windows Vista it'll be killer.

Saxito Pau · « **Reply #64 on:** February 10, 2008, 02:47:41 PM »

*looks to see that the fuss is all about..*

*checks shivadee's profile...*

*sees system specs...*

O_O

*leaves thread*

Carigamers · « **Reply #64 on:** February 10, 2008, 02:47:41 PM »

shivadee · « **Reply #65 on:** February 10, 2008, 02:59:38 PM »

Maybee one day ill benchmark mine

maybee. Right now it does what i want it to

Spazosaurus · « **Reply #66 on:** February 10, 2008, 05:38:57 PM »

LOL them specs is ting to cry for in truth yes. Lawd fadda yuh HAVE to fling up some benchmarks man.

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #67 on:** April 02, 2008, 12:01:06 AM »

finally did my upgrade and woe is me, for my scores justify a measly 8th place.

Everything at stock
3Dmark 2006 Results
Score 9336 3DMarks
Date    Apr 01, 2008 22:43 CDT
OS    Microsoft Windows XP
CPU    Intel Core 2 Duo E6850
CPU Speed    3000 MHz
GPU Speed    NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB (Arc's card @ stock)
Memory    4GB

Next stop, COD4 b1atches!

Spazosaurus · « **Reply #68 on:** April 02, 2008, 07:11:04 AM »

Hahaha you noob which is it 320mb or 640 8800gts? It cant be both.

But that's a score at stock speed. A lil overclock of the cpu and the card would easily push you over the magical 10k mark.

Crixx_Creww · « **Reply #69 on:** April 02, 2008, 08:16:38 AM »

you can oc the card easily and safely since yur such a scaredy cat bout ocing

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #70 on:** April 02, 2008, 09:03:23 AM »

Edited for clarity. Its the 320mb card. Copied the info direct from 3DMarks Result page. They had it so listed (320/640)

Ditto for the ram.

lol @ scaredy cat with the OC. COD4 running like butter, though I thought it would look a little grittier like Gears of War with all eye candy on. Say wha....suhuweat!!!!

Patched to 1.05 last night and copper shotted some noobs this morning. Time to Xfire it up again.

Doh worry Crixx, when a game starts to frame, I'll consider OC. (Avoids Crisis, lol)

Saxito Pau · « **Reply #71 on:** April 07, 2008, 01:29:05 PM »

A minor issues of sorts i have observed since W1nTry posted his updated thread.

i would like to advise that the default resolutions for 3DMark 06 are 1280 x 1024 and 1280 x 960 (normal and widescreen resolutions)

I guess it wouldn't hurt if those with widescreens redo their benchies...

Eroo · « **Reply #72 on:** April 07, 2008, 01:48:28 PM »

This not kinda unfair to ppl with 4:3 monitors? Obviously their scores will be lower.

Saxito Pau · « **Reply #73 on:** April 07, 2008, 02:39:41 PM »

Quote from: Eroo on April 07, 2008, 01:48:28 PM

This not kinda unfair to ppl with 4:3 monitors? Obviously their scores will be lower.

well it's widescreen being pushed now... and i just making a suggestion based on what i observed

I my scores are more or less the same since changing from a 4:3 to a 16:9 display.. so i would say that there should be no issue really...

The most i can do is to post comparative scores as i have both a 4:3 and a 16:9 display... hell, i'll start a thread for that purpose..

Spazosaurus · « **Reply #74 on:** April 07, 2008, 02:49:54 PM »

even if your monitor is a 16:9 ratio it WOULD be able to display 4:3 aspect ratio good enough for the purposes of the benchmark. Even with my 22", 3dmark06 comes up on 1280x1024 by default and the tests look fine.

I think w1n's case is special though since he is running a HD television which is restricted to showing one resolution only. As for the rest of us, we should be fine.

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #75 on:** April 07, 2008, 03:14:22 PM »

mc, w1n's new score will put me down to 9th. Just upgraded and already @ risk of being pushed out the top 10. A thousand cures. lol

CMR170889 · « **Reply #76 on:** April 08, 2008, 08:09:39 AM »

Quote from: shivadee on February 10, 2008, 02:59:38 PM

Maybee one day ill benchmark mine
maybee. Right now it does what i want it to

What do you want it to do....Take over the world ? I feel you own Intel or have shares in Nvidia

And I use to think I was cool

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #77 on:** April 18, 2008, 06:32:35 PM »

Upgrade again immc, minor one this time.

Changed the 8800 GTS 320mb to an 8800 GT 512mb

Everything at stock
3Dmark 2006 Results
Score 10,507 3DMarks
Date Apr 18, 2008 18:31 CDT
OS Microsoft Windows XP
CPU Intel Core 2 Duo E6850
CPU Speed 3000 MHz
GPU Speed NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 512mb
Memory 4GB

Just to secure my top 10 placement, muhahahha (runs over w1n's rig)

and once again, next stop, COD4 b1atches!

W1nTry · « **Reply #78 on:** April 19, 2008, 01:47:42 PM »

Post the necessary screenies to back ur claim XD (i'm positive it's true but let's do it right!!!)

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #79 on:** April 19, 2008, 03:48:55 PM »

I posted 'em in my "build noob a rig" thread already. do I have to post 'em here too?

Carigamers · « **Reply #79 on:** April 19, 2008, 03:48:55 PM »

Author Topic: GATT Members' Top Rigs (3DMark06) (Read 148740 times)

Carigamers

Carigamers

Carigamers

ShoutBox