kick ass reply
lol @ Jim.
I am not Bush's bride...but point taken....it's not my place to defend
him....he earned the right to all those aspersions by being at the helm
of America. Surely someone is on the payroll to keep his nose clean and
it ain't me.
I know more than most about the interest America has in middle east
oil.(remember where I work, it's a hot topic at the office, lol) Sept 11
was the perfect excuse and it remains that.
For the Geneva convention to apply, the POWs have to meet certain
criteria.....remember that. These terrorists aren't exactly run of the
mill uniformed soldiers briefed on such things and surely aren't going
to hold up their end. One man's wedding ceremony is another's terrorist
meeting.
Two sides to every story.
Certainly, the conspiracy theory sounds great....but if they bombin
weddings I don't think they will hold back on Osama. Sounds like sweat
buss for any terrorist that fall under the cross hairs of a M4 wieldin
soldier. Kill them before they kill you....and I don't think they need
an email from dear old president.bush@thewhitehouse.com to come to that
conclusion.
lol
Brian Jamurath wrote:
> Jim, move the veil off your eyes, like you're Bush's bride...
> Think about it, you claim Bin Laden was responsible for the deed,
> but where is he now? They making any effort to get him?
> So you attack Iraq, and put your vice president's company in
> charge of oil infrastructure rebuilding, and took down Iraq and
> took out the only pin holding all the factions together...Saddam.
> Killed a lot of civs (they bombed a wedding last week!) and now
> wondering why the Iraqis not thankful??
> The Geneva Convention states that POWs must be treated fairly, and
> from the reports i'm hearing, it's been torture, rape, and killing. Men &
> women.
>
> This dude is spending about $2billion on education and about
> $140billion on war.
> All this by a man who was put in the president's office by the Supreme
> Court
> (one of which had some relation to him) and not elected. So there went
> democracy.
>
> Now I have no problem with self defence, someone attacks you've a
> right to defend,
> whoever did what 9/11 (apparantly some of them were Israleis! you know
> Bush wouldn't
> touch them) should be taught a lesson....but you haven't even caught
> the named offender, or
> have any leads to him, but you attacking a set of jep nests along the
> way, and on top of that
> Bush have some sorts of oil dealings with Osama in the past....makes u
> think.
>
>
> [X]-Baego wrote:
>
>> wtmc, I now seeing this @ home
>>
>> like BG spam filter block this one too.
>>
>> you inserting some cuss words in white font inbetween yuh text or what?
>>
>>
>> What hidden news you talking bout? There is nothing to become
>> "public" that
>> would prove me wrong.
>>
>> Sept 11 is proof enough that terrorism is real, WMD or not. That is
>> sufficient for a nation to establish war on terrorism the world over.
>> Not
>> just America mind you....all nations. It was the WORLD trade center
>> after
>> all. Ill treatment of said terrorist is unnecessary but expected.
>>
>>
>> but to answer the question, yes I read those stories. Did you read
>> the ones
>> I posted? Did you know about the statements Robinson made?
>>
>> let me ask another question.
>>
>> Could you summarise my point(s) and yours? I am curious to see if we
>> are on
>> the same page.
>>
>>
>> 1) There is absolutely no way to discern a civillian from a
>> terrorist. (they
>> probably don't even know what the geneva convention is, don't wear
>> uniforms,
>> dog tags, etc..)
>>
>> 2) Bush's name is used for reading mileage and trolling for
>> pageviews. He is
>> WAY too far at the top to be directly involved in 99% of the things
>> reporters would have you believe he was aware off or instigated.
>>
>> 3) War crimes are expected, only difference now is that thanks to the
>> internet and flagrant use of scanners/digital cameras in the last 20
>> years....john doe is getting a sneak peek.
>>
>> 4) A few bad apples can indeed spoil the bunch. America is not a
>> homogenous
>> entity but the actions of a few idiots in an army of millions
>> fighting a war
>> against terror does tarnish the image of it as a world leader in both
>> might
>> and moral integrity. Keep in mind this part...."the actions of a FEW
>> IDIOTS"
>>
>> 5) Kissing the forehead of a wounded soldier and praying with him and
>> later
>> with Tony Blair is NOT a bad thing. (Religious wars back in 1805
>> aside) They
>> are facing nations on the bleeding edge of religious fanatacism,
>> using it
>> for all of it's worth....and Bush is gettin lambaste for saying a prayer
>> with a one armed victim of the war? BS....nah it deserve de full
>> thing.....BULL SH1T!
>>
>> Blowing smoke....focus on the real problem.
>>
>> Get serious.
>>
>> You know what is the worst part of all of this.....the goodness of the
>> American people that lead them to inflict damage on themselves.
>>
>> When they dropped "little boy" on Hiroshima....the pilot wrote in his
>> journal....."What have we done"
>>
>> Jackass like him....those words spread across the internet as
>> testament to
>> the "evil" that is America. Obviously he wasn't mindful of the damage
>> that
>> would have done to the "current administration"....nor did he harken
>> back to
>> his fallen comrades @ pearl harbour, many of which were still trapped
>> in the
>> belly of their vessels, now a watery grave, compliments japan. You don't
>> just start a war like that and say....oops...my bad. Bomb iymc.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kayode James"
>> <spider-guy@tstt.net.tt>
>> To: <gatt@gatt.co.tt>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:18 AM
>> Subject: RE: {GATT} OT: Shock Reporting, Bush calls for focus on the
>> real
>> problem
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Baego, did you read those stories? It's amazing how you jump to these
>>> conclusions with logical information presented to you.
>>>
>>> But I'm glad you understand the rationale behind media shock and
>>> awe. Bush
>>> used it to great effect to start this war in the first place.
>>>
>>> And now, a year later, his administration is admitting that they were
>>>
>>
>> wrong
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> To remove yourself from this list, send an email to majordomo@gatt.co.tt
>> with 'unsubscribe gatt' in the body.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To remove yourself from this list, send an email to majordomo@gatt.co.tt
> with 'unsubscribe gatt' in the body.
>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, send an email to majordomo@gatt.co.tt
with 'unsubscribe gatt' in the body.
