Author Topic: are there any military nuts out there? (Read 7395 times)

Bob · « **Reply #20 on:** May 14, 2004, 02:08:27 PM »

You real advantageous boy!

lol

Carigamers · « **Reply #20 on:** May 14, 2004, 02:08:27 PM »

coledraft · « **Reply #21 on:** May 14, 2004, 04:36:24 PM »

Quote

From my understanding in the dogfights of ww2 it was the one who cud climb faster and train his guns on the enemy from a higher vantge point that usually won the dogfight.

cool I agree with that....but all I am saying is that manuverability is an important factor in an aircraft

snake_eater · « **Reply #22 on:** May 14, 2004, 09:41:19 PM »

i want to fly a navy f18 plane
*imagine going faster than mark2*

coledraft · « **Reply #23 on:** May 17, 2004, 01:10:34 PM »

What is the name of the bomb that the americans developed to assult tunnel networks via an aircraft by initially releasing some explosive gas into the tunnel and then detenating it. They were considering it a weapon of mass destruction and the showed on future fighting machines on tech tv. Oh and has it been finally developed

Imperial_X · « **Reply #24 on:** May 17, 2004, 01:45:26 PM »

Wasn't that dubbed the bunker buster bomb?

Carigamers · « **Reply #24 on:** May 17, 2004, 01:45:26 PM »

coledraft · « **Reply #25 on:** May 17, 2004, 08:16:13 PM »

Nah its not the bunker buster it some other type of bomb I just can't put my finger on its name

Flippant · « **Reply #26 on:** May 17, 2004, 10:12:24 PM »

yeah i think i know what you mean, i am not sure of the name either.

it fills the cavern with an extremely high temperature accelerant and VOOM
it is designed to destroy chemical and biological munitions.

the US military also is developing nuclear bunker busters...a truly amazingly stupid idea if you think this all the way through.

Imperial_X · « **Reply #27 on:** May 18, 2004, 01:52:16 PM »

Blowing the "possible" nuke sites to shreds thereby causing severe radioactivity levels by said "nuke/s" in its surrounding area is part of the American dream.

coledraft · « **Reply #28 on:** May 20, 2004, 03:49:34 PM »

the ultimate splash damage

Imperial_X · « **Reply #29 on:** May 20, 2004, 05:12:59 PM »

Splash damage. STARCRAFT!!!!! But...hate Terran!!!!!! ARRRRRRRRRGGGH!!!!!

coledraft · « **Reply #30 on:** May 21, 2004, 04:15:25 PM »

well starcraft is pretty good but Generals zero hour is it

coledraft · « **Reply #31 on:** May 21, 2004, 04:15:50 PM »

well starcraft is pretty good but Generals zero hour is more practical

Rommel · « **Reply #32 on:** June 01, 2004, 11:09:54 PM »

if a bomb hits a nuke it would most likely not go nuclear

you have to understand the physhics of how modern weapons build up critical mass

also

To: Bob
Subject: Information on Delta Force

I have aquired a book in barbados written by one of the original members about this very secrative unit

when I finish it I will happily answer any questions covered by the book
unless you bought it down here yourself

Reaper2051 · « **Reply #33 on:** June 02, 2004, 06:25:26 AM »

lol

coledraft · « **Reply #34 on:** June 04, 2004, 07:49:10 AM »

Quote from: "Rommel"

if a bomb hits a nuke it would most likely not go nuclear

Imperal didn't necessarily say blow up nukes using bombs...all was said was blowing up nukes

Rommel · « **Reply #35 on:** June 05, 2004, 02:57:49 AM »

true

but it is the same for however they are blow up (note, not detonated, Imperial said blowing up possible nuke sites, so he couldn't have meant detonating the actual weapon)

there is a risk of spreading the fissionable material around

but since the explosion is not part of the controlled process of detonating for a nuclear yield

there will be no nuclear yield

that is why a dirty bomb doesn't go nuclear

Carigamers · « **Reply #35 on:** June 05, 2004, 02:57:49 AM »

Author Topic: are there any military nuts out there? (Read 7395 times)

Carigamers

Carigamers

Carigamers

ShoutBox