I'm reading some reviews this morning, and wow,
talk about hate from so-called 'critics'.
I think they all (deliberately?) missed the point. Par for the course, really.
It's easy to be a liberal, metro-sexual, square-rimmed glasses wearing, slack-jawed f@#$0t (Predator reference
) whose 'job' is to sit around all day watching movies to 'review'
The US Navy never apologised, or made excuses (as far as I can tell) for what this movie was intended to serve as,
or who its target audience was.
I hold no brief for America (or their foreign policy for that matter), but I totally get where the film-makers went with this.
I personally think this is a lot better than the overpaid-actor crap that's been Hollywood's staple for years.
So what if it's aimed at the Call Of Duty/action junkie/combat veteran set? Must every movie be of the 'nuanced', expertly acted (according to the 'critics'), Oscar worthy (read: overpaid-actor crap) variety?
I'd watch this movie a THOUSAND times before watching 'Hunger Games', or some other 'nuanced' bull$#!t.
There, I said it. [/rant]
Feel free to disagree of course...
*dons*