Author Topic: !EVERYTHING! PS3 (Read 747011 times)

BloodWar · « **Reply #700 on:** August 27, 2007, 08:59:40 PM »

Hey i never said home would attract new customers i said it was a good idea i was referring more to u saying home is a waste before it actually releases.

As for army of two what Gears of war have to do with it? i just though army of two looks like a good game and ive been lookin for a good co-op game for a while and i think this looks better than kane and lynch and the controls look great from the gameplay video. And anyone who said Gears of War had nothing to offer is an idiot OMG first time i saw a trailer for that game i was like OMFG that game rox lol. Then i played it o.o its too good wah when it comes out on pc ill get the new cards just for that lol.

Carigamers · « **Reply #700 on:** August 27, 2007, 08:59:40 PM »

shivadee · « **Reply #701 on:** August 28, 2007, 09:29:50 AM »

Quote from: BloodWar on August 27, 2007, 08:59:40 PM

And anyone who said Gears of War had nothing to offer is an idiot OMG first time i saw a trailer for that game i was like OMFG that game rox lol. Then i played it o.o its too good wah when it comes out on pc ill get the new cards just for that lol.

It doesnt take much to impress you then?
Because the "first" demo of the game just showed the Unreal 3 physics. Only after seeing the demo of the first level first hand at E3 last year did i really notice how impressive the game was. And i still only prefer the single player campaign co-op. I like the harder difficulties and finishing it in less time.
General Ram on the hardest level.....lawd

I know Arcman, Redlum and W1ntry dissagree with me. Them men chronic on GoW online. I come on now and then and get real kix with them. Fun online with a group of trini's playing d @ss and going around saying "is not the lassssssshhhh they fear"

BloodWar · « **Reply #702 on:** August 28, 2007, 12:20:01 PM »

oh i wasnt really paying attention to the game so when i say first time i see trailer i mean the one with actual gameplay after release lmao. I really dont see how that game would work online i heard someone say not much players can go in a room i forgot how many. But for online shooters i like lotsa players 16 minimum

unless u playin friends in which case size dont matter.

shivadee · « **Reply #703 on:** August 28, 2007, 03:59:14 PM »

agreed.

Actually in HALO 2 i had more fun playing multiteam 3v3v3 or 2v2 and sometimes 4v4 more than 16v16. Unless you have a clan of 16 it is awesome.
Setting up a LAN with 16 players in HALO 2 was on of the most enjoyable experiences i have ever had in gaming. You know everyone, everyone right there so when you pwn them you, them and EVERYONE around you know.

This random team matchup they do in HALO and in Resistance is kinda @ss...a set of "im host so i chose the game, i chose the level....do what i say...la dee da..." Im 12 years old.

That is a huge reason i dont play online in some games because of these random matchups. i go online and have friends that i team up with, its much more fun, much more rewarding and we talk about that one shot snipe that took a guy out X amount of yards away just as he was about to mele a team member for weeks. *ask Redlum*

from 5v5 in HALO to 5v5 in Arena in World of Warcraft...i much preffer a team of people you know, can work with and trust so you can accomplish a goal....MUCH more than a random group of 12....RARELY do things get done. You see people running off in all kinda directions doing all kinda Sh!t

I know alot more people online on LIVE than i do on PS3 online....the ones i know in the US with their PS3...are not online! LOL they are on their XBOX.
I guess Apprentice and Bloodwar and us have to see how things go. Dont mind getting a little group together, i know Apprentice trying for a looooooong time now. And fellas...get a headset na...please. Dont do this keyboard typing or worse yet PS3 typing that i hadda wait a year an a half for you to do.

TheApprentice · « **Reply #704 on:** August 28, 2007, 04:05:18 PM »

Quote from: shivadee on August 28, 2007, 03:59:14 PM

I guess Apprentice and Bloodwar and us have to see how things go. Dont mind getting a little group together, i know Apprentice trying for a looooooong time now. And fellas...get a headset na...please. Dont do this keyboard typing or worse yet PS3 typing that i hadda wait a year an a half for you to do.

AMEN!

Carigamers · « **Reply #704 on:** August 28, 2007, 04:05:18 PM »

BloodWar · « **Reply #705 on:** August 28, 2007, 06:58:35 PM »

Lol i ordering Warhawk with headset Friday so i gettin it soon and yeah as i said the multiplayer experience is only better with less people when u have a group of friends cuz if u get teamed up with a few noobs u dont know u a dead man lol.

Oh and What drakes fortune have to do with Army of two i said i been looking for a good " Co-op game " for a while so its between that and Kane and Lynch and Army of 2 looks better.

Edit: rumors spreading that Heavenly Sword is only 10-12 hrs with a low replay value because they used 10gb in space for audio ( 8 different languages ) and didnt work on the games story as much. I dunno bout you guys but if this true i not payin $60 for a 10-12hr game i mean back on ps2 when they had short action/adventure games no probs but now with all that space it cant be that short.

TheApprentice · « **Reply #706 on:** August 28, 2007, 08:01:41 PM »

^Dude its heavenly sword...

I'd buy it @ $100US

lol

well thats due to my extreme desperate want for it...

err @ warhawk...I wanna order it.... Should I?

BloodWar · « **Reply #707 on:** August 28, 2007, 08:52:43 PM »

i dunno drakes fortune aint all that appealing to me for me shooters have to be either more mature like GoW,Resistance,Killzone or something like Ratchet and Clank that is somewhere in the middle lol i dunno i dont really have much interest in it.

But when i say im lookin for a good co-op game u dont think that game lol. And as for the length of action adventure games its a new generation if they still have games that short whats the point :/. I got really mad when i beat God of war lol it was so short but i didnt pay $60 US for it so it was more than worth it and it was fun to replay but when i paying $60us a game there should be some more advancements than more languages yay! and prettier graphics :/.

BloodWar · « **Reply #708 on:** August 29, 2007, 07:31:03 PM »

But couldnt that extra 7 languages be used as more gameplay i dunno i say the price raises the quality should raise and to me heavenly sword although controls are cool is the kind of game that could have been pulled of on ps2 with less graphics of course, but then all those enemies at once is impressive but still.... Gameplay is more important than graphics to me and I cant be expected to pay twice the price and game is just as long as before. As for quality over quantity. Isnt it possible to make the game larger while still keeping the quality? more bosses more enemies and such?

Ok Warhawk is sounding to be amazing ive seen some gameplay vidz and ive watched a friend of min play via viewcam lol and everyone who reviewed it thus far loves it. The jabra headset is cool as it charges in 1-2 hours and lasts for 8-9 hours so its more than worth the extra money for bluetooth version if u dont have headset.

rb · « **Reply #709 on:** August 29, 2007, 07:55:45 PM »

I'm not feeling heavenly sword as much anymore, gameplay seems like it will be highly repetitive, hopefully I'm wrong, I love the millions of hard ai enemies though.

BloodWar · « **Reply #710 on:** August 30, 2007, 06:35:19 AM »

60 gb ps3's are now officially out of stock

Quote

Well we knew it wouldn't last forever. Sony has just confirmed with GamePro that they have run out of 60GB PS3s in their warehouses -- the only 60GB units left are ones that are in the retail channel now. This means that if you want a $499 PS3 with full backwards compatibility, you better hit up the shops soon.

full story here :
http://www.ps3fanboy.com/2007/08/29/sony-has-run-out-of-60gb-ps3s-get-one-while-you-can/

shivadee · « **Reply #711 on:** August 31, 2007, 12:02:47 AM »

Quote from: rb on August 29, 2007, 07:55:45 PM

I'm not feeling heavenly sword as much anymore, gameplay seems like it will be highly repetitive, hopefully I'm wrong, I love the millions of hard ai enemies though.

according to IGN's review thats the downfall of the game

disapointing...

well Warhawk is apparently better than i thought! so thats nice

BloodWar · « **Reply #712 on:** August 31, 2007, 12:13:05 AM »

yeah im orderin warhawk tomoro people get it! so we can go online and hit people some jedi style flying.

vivman1107 · « **Reply #713 on:** August 31, 2007, 08:08:52 AM »

Umm ... about Heavenly Sword ... I'm not sure what people have been expecting from this game. From the start, it has been your standard beat-em-up in the vein of Devil May Cry and God of War. I expect to have a good time kicking some @$$ and that's all I have to say about that.

shivadee · « **Reply #714 on:** August 31, 2007, 09:29:32 AM »

Quote from: vivman1107 on August 31, 2007, 08:08:52 AM

Umm ... about Heavenly Sword ... I'm not sure what people have been expecting from this game. From the start, it has been your standard beat-em-up in the vein of Devil May Cry and God of War. I expect to have a good time kicking some @$$ and that's all I have to say about that.

only DMC i liked was the first. God of war was an excelent game...i started playing 2 and was wondering why (although the gameplay was better) why i couldnt want to finish it like the first.
Reason was..i friggin hate Kratos.....his attitude. In the first one you can see why he is miffed. Man killed his family out of rage and under the control of the God of War. He did everything, had to protect his family again at the end and then took vengence.

Now....its like meh. I mean he wants to do the same thing again. The story didnt drive me to play it.

This one i was expecting a good storyline from the time i heard Andy Serkis was in it. I would imagine that because they spent all this money on cutscenes it would prove to be compelling in storyline.

I may yet to still enjoy it. Sometimes I like games despite negative reviews and I have lots of fun with it. I will still be buying it.

shivadee · « **Reply #715 on:** August 31, 2007, 10:35:23 PM »

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/lair/review.html?sid=6178017&tag=topslot;title;1&om_act=convert&om_clk=topslot

Lair review above....FOUR out of TEN

the game is @@@@@SSSSSS......just like i SAID....i dont know WHY people were expecting anything from this game. The dragon doesnt do ANYTHING....one button mash...thats it.
Duh....a beautiful disaster....as expected.

BloodWar · « **Reply #716 on:** August 31, 2007, 11:34:38 PM »

I never thought lair would succeed i saw some vidz and i wasnt impressed but what can i say lol. Anytime anyone asked me if i was gettin lair id be like ill see when it comes out.

TheApprentice · « **Reply #717 on:** August 31, 2007, 11:36:55 PM »

^agreed.... LAIR looked great initially..but i always wanted to wait for them reviews..

Guess LAIR is off my list and & 60 bucks will go to another title like MoH Airborne... (again awaits reviews)

BloodWar · « **Reply #718 on:** September 01, 2007, 12:05:13 AM »

Ok i ordered warhawk ill get it in about a week i already have 1 friend with WH he lives in Canada but oh well anyone else planning on getting it, its a great multiplayer experiece says all the reviews.

Arcmanov · « **Reply #719 on:** September 01, 2007, 04:42:15 PM »

Heavenly Sword review from 1UP.com.

Carigamers · « **Reply #719 on:** September 01, 2007, 04:42:15 PM »

Author Topic: !EVERYTHING! PS3 (Read 747011 times)

Carigamers

Carigamers

Carigamers

ShoutBox