Author Topic: POLL XBOX 360 or PS3.............which would u buy first????? (Read 22753 times)

Kaizen · « **Reply #20 on:** June 22, 2005, 08:31:31 AM »

To The Earlier post Sony is god in japan
note are they god anywhere else?
blasted sony everything i buy from them easy to mash up
i goin with 360 but 350 is how much i limit to spen
note i dont hate sony and will buy a ps3 once it fullfill atleast half of what it boasting it comin out with but i stickin to 360 and so is Tecmo

lmao

Carigamers · « **Reply #20 on:** June 22, 2005, 08:31:31 AM »

suzieboy · « **Reply #21 on:** June 22, 2005, 09:07:05 AM »

......an Bungie!

shivadee · « **Reply #22 on:** June 22, 2005, 12:34:18 PM »

actually the damn thing cant even open its tray properly

W1nTry · « **Reply #23 on:** July 04, 2005, 12:29:20 PM »

I have a few pictures here that may make ppl want to NOT second rate the Xbox 360. In response to a splurge of websites blasting Bizarre creations (makers of Project Gotham Racing franchise) for sending them real photos instead of in-game screenshots, they have showed that the pictures sent were in fact constructed by them and showed the wireframe behind the shots themselves. Additionally they changed the scenes that they originally sent just to show it was their creation. The websites have since halted any defamatory exclamations of fake! These are absolutely gorgeous, take a look (see below) also the site is:
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2005/07/01/pgr3_screenshots

shivadee · « **Reply #24 on:** July 04, 2005, 12:44:35 PM »

You should see them vids in MOTION!!! even better.
the NFS demo i played was amazing. You seeing the light glint off the friggin rims of the M3 as you burning out for a run.
Oh and alyuh SONY men. The PS3 plans to retail for 400.00 US eh.

Carigamers · « **Reply #24 on:** July 04, 2005, 12:44:35 PM »

suzieboy · « **Reply #25 on:** July 04, 2005, 03:24:21 PM »

Wey.....them thing lookin photo realistic boy....
W1nTry,shivadee or anyone , do u have any PS3 pics to show and tell....to make it even nah ?

ProtoJoe · « **Reply #26 on:** July 04, 2005, 04:42:02 PM »

Honestly, if money wasnt a problem, I would get them both.....but since it is limited, I would prefer the PS3. Mostly because to me it offers more....

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #27 on:** July 04, 2005, 11:12:06 PM »

whoa @ those screen shots

my word!

ganja_man_biatch · « **Reply #28 on:** July 06, 2005, 02:59:25 AM »

i'll get the one that has the bttr games, might have to wait an extra 6 months but it's all good, from the info i've read so far, the ps3 specs out preforms the x box360, but the ps3 will not be bundled with a harddrive like the 360, which means u gotsa go buy the ps3's hd seperate. so the xbox might be the best choice price wise

shivadee · « **Reply #29 on:** July 06, 2005, 09:03:18 AM »

Currently there is no finality about the PS3 HDD. From the SONY press conference many people get chain up. the XBOX 360 specs werent official at the time, they were only "said" not released officially. In other words PS3 compared the PC SPECS of a 3.2GHz PC not the specs of the actual 360.

To add to this. Nuff people laughed at the curent XBOX Graphics card. Nvidia GeForce 2 64MB. You tell me where you goin to find a GeForce 2 64MB pushing graphics like that except XBOX. WHat I saying, SONY made a false comparison of the system to the XBOX.

What is making the PS3 sell for 4 bill is the Blue-Ray technology. Very cool stuff. I see that they taking infront before infront take them. The PS2 only had a 4X DVD reader and that took a toll on the system (burnt out lenses etc). This time they having the upgrade right there. This should be interesting to see.

Another thing. These Blue Ray DVD's supposed to hold about 24GB single and almost twice that dual layer. How much you think you going to have to pay for that? And games already expecting to raise from 50 to 60 US this rounds for REGULAR DVD's

Kaizen · « **Reply #30 on:** July 06, 2005, 07:13:40 PM »

ey Blue ray and Hd Dvd have been cancelled btw horsie
they are now "Merging"
info iwmc

Czar · « **Reply #31 on:** July 07, 2005, 02:25:47 PM »

Quote from: Kaizen on July 06, 2005, 07:13:40 PM

ey Blue ray and Hd Dvd have been cancelled btw horsie
they are now "Merging"
info iwmc

Errr...mind sharing a link to that?

I know they were in talks about a month or so ago...but from what I read, talks broke down and Toshiba and Sony went their separate ways...i.e. no more merging of the standards...

W1nTry · « **Reply #32 on:** July 07, 2005, 02:28:24 PM »

Czar is quite correct, they went back along their separate paths, but I believe the matter has worked out in Sony's favour as its really the movie industry aka hollywood thats gonna determine the next standard they want to use, which for all intents and purposes seems to be Blue Ray. HD DVD will have other niche market segments supposedly.

justinkoo · « **Reply #33 on:** July 07, 2005, 05:31:39 PM »

definitely ps3 because it has killzone 2. I'd buy it just for that and im not even that big on sony

W1nTry · « **Reply #34 on:** July 08, 2005, 08:54:56 AM »

This is something new to me, and I think relavant to this thread. Everyone is saying well PS3 has this game and its better looking etc, other say the Xbox will be just as good, earlier and possibly more affordable etc. Now what do u have to say if I told you that the GPU behind the PS3 was nothign more than a 90nm version tweaked a lil OF A Geforce 7800GTX? or G70??? now take into account that ATI has been working on their chip for the Xbox360 for alot more time and its designed specifically for the Xbox and we KNOW that the 'FUDO' or next gen ATI chip will best the 7800GTX. So lets compare again:
1. The Cell is positioned to be more powerful than the PowerPC derivative the Xbox is using (by how much time will tell)
2. The RSX chip that is being used inside the PS3 is nothing more than a Geforce 7800 line of GPUs which will most likely be less powerful and possibly have less pipelines than the next ATI card.
3. The Xbox will come with a HD the PS3 will be optional at a higher price most likely
4. The Xbox comes with the now quite matured Xbox live free
5. The PS3 will be completely backwards compatible whereas the Xbox360 will be partially backwards compatible.

So I think based on this things are changed up a bit, now the graphics on each may not have any sig edge over the other the 360 might even turn up being able to push more eyecandy for all we know. The real diff now is blue ray (which will be prohibitively expensive at first and not 'copy-able') and the 360 will be out first. Here is the article I picked somethings up from:

Quote

RSX is G70, 90 nanometre tweaked

Sony gave Nvidia no choice

By Fuad Abazovic: Thursday 07 July 2005, 09:40
YOU ALL KNOW that Sony wanted to makes its complete console based on Cell marchitecture. It eventually did it partially, as the CPU is Cell based but it learned that Cell is not that good for graphic.

It had to pull some emergency strings and Nvidia was the perfect choice. It already made the Xbox graphics chip, had experience with consoles and knew all it had to know about graphics. The only bad thing was that Sony approached Nvidia very late, and didn’t leave this talented company much time to do a proper job for a Sony Playstation 3.

Nvidia did make a good chip design based on 90 nanometre marchitecture but it didn’t design the chip from scratch. We were told more than once that RSX is 90 nanometre G70 adjusted to fit into a console and to do whatever it has to do.

We wrote before that Sony will do those chips in its own factories so Nvidia doesn’t have to worry about yields, TSMC marchitecture and stuff like that as Sony is supposed to make everything work. Nvidia still has to tape out its RSX chip but it should happen very soon now.

ATI, on the other hand, had two whole years to finish its R500 chip. We learned that it should be just enough time to make the chip design and to have it ready. Therefore, in some ways, ATI might have a slight advantage over Nvidia at least in consoles, while Nvidia is picking up fast in the discrete business. The tables are turning one more time.

We don’t want to jump to any conclusions about which is better - ATI's R500 and Xbox 360 or Nvidia's RSX in Playstation 3 - as both consoles and chips have their own audiences who will be more than happy to get one of them. Xbox 360 is coming first, while Playstation 3 coming later should be backward compatible with older games. Xbox 360 will be backward compatible but not for all titles.

Battalion · « **Reply #35 on:** July 26, 2005, 12:52:34 AM »

I'm sorry, I've seen more footage of the 360 than the PS3 but I still have to go with Sony. Dunno just looks like it gonna rock. Also dunno how true but I heard a rumour of blue tooth connectability.

ProtoJoe · « **Reply #36 on:** September 26, 2005, 03:47:14 PM »

LMAO! I real found this funny!

Unbiased my ass! I agree, Halo 3 is gonna be real bad, but its not gonna be enough to be classified as a "console killer". What MS is trying to do is what what ps1 did with FFVIII to the dreamcast....

Thoughts? And keep flaming to a mimimum please...

shivadee · « **Reply #37 on:** September 26, 2005, 04:30:38 PM »

it have an XBOX world 360? that is a sh!TTY Lookin magazine dey. To talk up PS3 so. I getting both.....me eh cater.

ProtoJoe · « **Reply #38 on:** September 26, 2005, 05:27:06 PM »

Actually I rather get the ps3 first, and then if anything get the 360 (or atleast makesure and have good friends with one

) And I know one person for sure who would get the rev, and we already are pretty close so ive got that covered..

Kaizen · « **Reply #39 on:** September 26, 2005, 05:32:03 PM »

i hadda go with shivadee there get em both

Carigamers · « **Reply #39 on:** September 26, 2005, 05:32:03 PM »

Poll

WHICH WOULD U BUY ?

Author Topic: POLL XBOX 360 or PS3.............which would u buy first????? (Read 22753 times)

Carigamers

Carigamers

ganja_man_biatch

Carigamers

ShoutBox