...umm...
It's cool that u did all the capturing etc, but in terms of grading it as a video....a 'meh' at best.
If I was to grade it on a scale of 1-100...
It'll get about 58-60. And that's being kinda generous, editing/timing skills....needs work on for sure...also the footage audio was distracting for the most part, that should have been removed as well!
Keeping in mind, I do mark these things harshly, and only in the form of the finished product, not knocking the things u went through to getting it done...if u can compress the footage and whatnot, including all the cutscenes to about 2-3 GB, sling them my way and I'll see what I can do for a music video on my humble 1.8 GHz Celeron...
.
*edit #1: How long did it take you to do that first video? Cuz I don't use much effects, just plain editing...and I don't use Premiere or Movie Maker, so we'll see the difference...*
*edit #2: Your 2nd one isn't much (if at all) better than the first, needs a lot of work*
It's cool that u did all the capturing etc, but in terms of grading it as a video....a 'meh' at best.
If I was to grade it on a scale of 1-100...
It'll get about 58-60. And that's being kinda generous, editing/timing skills....needs work on for sure...also the footage audio was distracting for the most part, that should have been removed as well!
Keeping in mind, I do mark these things harshly, and only in the form of the finished product, not knocking the things u went through to getting it done...if u can compress the footage and whatnot, including all the cutscenes to about 2-3 GB, sling them my way and I'll see what I can do for a music video on my humble 1.8 GHz Celeron...
.*edit #1: How long did it take you to do that first video? Cuz I don't use much effects, just plain editing...and I don't use Premiere or Movie Maker, so we'll see the difference...*
*edit #2: Your 2nd one isn't much (if at all) better than the first, needs a lot of work*
Logged
ssssssSSSSSSS...That's a nice everything you got there....SSSSSSS.
