Author Topic: Benchmark Thread of yesteryear (Read 56534 times)

.:Jedi:. · « **Reply #120 on:** December 11, 2006, 03:39:06 AM »

well yea.....i dont know of any 15" monitors that support 1280x1024. nice score there

Carigamers · « **Reply #120 on:** December 11, 2006, 03:39:06 AM »

rb · « **Reply #121 on:** December 13, 2006, 09:43:18 AM »

so i got a pc worth benching, dunno much about it though, and all i had is 3d mark 2001 & downloaded 3d mark06 last night. DUnno if I did it wrong, just ran everything at default and nothing overclocked.

Core 2 Duo E6300
2GB Dual Channel @ 667
7900GS 256mb

3dmark 2001 - 28175
3dmark06 - 4916

Prowl · « **Reply #122 on:** December 13, 2006, 01:00:02 PM »

Nice benchines there.

One thing I do want to point out is always run the 06 benchmarks at default if possible, the resolution scores can change by 1000! points just dropping down the rez ( in 06 hacked version! ).

and OH btw note the c2ds are dominating he bechmarks

MUHAHAHAHAAHAAAA

W1nTry · « **Reply #123 on:** December 13, 2006, 01:33:30 PM »

Quote from: Prowl on December 13, 2006, 01:00:02 PM

and OH btw note the c2ds are dominating he bechmarks

MUHAHAHAHAAHAAAA

Anyone notice that a 3500+ (SINGLE CORE) and the 3800+ (lowest dual core A64 just like the 6300 being the lowest C2D offering) have comparative scores than the C2D? with the SAME video card??? hmm funny that... (for prowl who clearly is getting as blind as crixx, I am reffering to Arcman posts). What this talk about dominating? I don't see any AM2 FX cpus on this forum. We know C2D dominates overall, but as far as GATT goes, where is the AMD contrasting platform to make such comments?

*W1nTry watches on in horror as prowl shaves head, dyes skin blue and begins to make funny pinging and ponging noises*

rb · « **Reply #124 on:** December 13, 2006, 01:48:16 PM »

I guess I should have mentioned that the pc is a xps ie DELL (insert jeering here). I ain't gonna overclock diddly

Carigamers · « **Reply #124 on:** December 13, 2006, 01:48:16 PM »

W1nTry · « **Reply #125 on:** December 13, 2006, 01:51:33 PM »

Quote from: rb on December 13, 2006, 01:48:16 PM

I guess I should have mentioned that the pc is a xps ie DELL (insert jeering here). I ain't gonna overclock diddly

*W1nTry points on and laughs self hysterically off chair and downstairs... lands with THUD*.... actually dude, whatever suites your needs best. Ok... its a dell, once it works and works well for the lifetime you expect, whaev right!

rb · « **Reply #126 on:** December 13, 2006, 01:56:26 PM »

didnt have a choice in the matter else i woulda gone a more beastly route. Pops laid it down nicely
"Dell or no new pc..choice is yours"

Crixx_Creww · « **Reply #127 on:** December 13, 2006, 02:44:22 PM »

that dell xps comes with a 7900 gs 256 mb? nicee

lol
first thing to do is format and reinstall xp and reinstall your drivers

then re benchify

and i dont know what hacknee nonsense winny tryin to pull
ALMOST sound like he tryin to say that intel not on top

rb · « **Reply #128 on:** December 13, 2006, 03:01:30 PM »

well it did come with mce and i installed the latest forceware, not gonna reinstall windows when i just installed wow (which came free with it)

Crixx_Creww · « **Reply #129 on:** December 13, 2006, 03:15:21 PM »

but its going to have all that dell imbedded SH&^%& which is gonna hamper performance

Prowl · « **Reply #130 on:** December 13, 2006, 11:31:45 PM »

Quote from: W1nTry on December 13, 2006, 01:33:30 PM

Quote from: Prowl on December 13, 2006, 01:00:02 PM
and OH btw note the c2ds are dominating he bechmarks

MUHAHAHAHAAHAAAA
Anyone notice that a 3500+ (SINGLE CORE) and the 3800+ (lowest dual core A64 just like the 6300 being the lowest C2D offering) have comparative scores than the C2D? with the SAME video card??? hmm funny that... (for prowl who clearly is getting as blind as crixx, I am reffering to Arcman posts). What this talk about dominating? I don't see any AM2 FX cpus on this forum. We know C2D dominates overall, but as far as GATT goes, where is the AMD contrasting platform to make such comments?

*W1nTry watches on in horror as prowl shaves head, dyes skin blue and begins to make funny pinging and ponging noises*

Before I shave my head, Arcman's benches were done @ 1024x768, which would give him close to 1000 3dmark06 points bonus over the rest of us running 1280x1024! The 3dmark05 results show this as it is 1024x768 by default, I ran my 3dmark05 and 06 @ 1280x1024!

Not his fault really but with the 15' monitor it can't handle full rez.

now if I were to run @ the lower rez hummmmmmmmmmmm

Now with that said I am not a crixx level fan boy, still waiting to see k8l before I shave my head and ............

Now to flame rb!

HOW DARE YOU INSULT THE C2D BY PUTTING IT IN A DELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SHAME ON YOU!!!!!

rb · « **Reply #131 on:** December 13, 2006, 11:38:56 PM »

yeah i used 1280 x 1024 as i said before everything default.

aye was dell or nothing

a smart man with a 5 yr old pc would choose dell over nothing...

Nephilim · « **Reply #132 on:** December 23, 2006, 12:31:56 AM »

Quote from: rb on December 13, 2006, 11:38:56 PM

yeah i used 1280 x 1024 as i said before everything default.

aye was dell or nothing

a smart man with a 5 yr old pc would choose dell over nothing...

as much as i hate Dell, yuh have a point.

ummm.... i new to this thread so i just wanna know, this good? I just install ah hit Run eh...

i just get a new v/c so i wanna know where i stand

take it easy on ah brother!

specs
1024MB PC3200
XFX 256MB 7600 GT
P4 3.0Ghz

Prowl · « **Reply #133 on:** December 24, 2006, 07:19:11 PM »

Not to bad, about on par with most 7600's out there.

Beomagi · « **Reply #134 on:** January 03, 2007, 05:18:06 PM »

really gotta get me 2k1 and 2k5 again, all i got since my last upgrade is 2k6.

6625 '06, had to back down the cpu - think i'm overdoing the power 550w antec tp when my gpu goes up this high. Cpu backed down from 4.51 to 4.3GHz (solved a slowdown in 3dmark and poor cpu score but only when gpu get pushed hard), got the gpu up from 621MHz core, 1440 Memory to 715(15%) MHz core, 1746(21%) memory.

Could be the 2 new harddrives I stuck in is nipping some of the power I once used. Either way, I wont miss the 200MHz.

Prowl · « **Reply #135 on:** January 03, 2007, 08:53:45 PM »

good god man! your the one causing all the blackouts!

W1nTry · « **Reply #136 on:** January 23, 2007, 11:47:54 AM »

Update:
3DMark01/03/05/06 (in that order):
24968
12954
9300
5260
All stock frequencies.
See more: http://gatt.carigamers.com/index.php/topic,5808.msg148158.html#msg148158

PS where all de intel men?

Prowl · « **Reply #137 on:** January 24, 2007, 01:21:54 PM »

We all right here, waiting paitently for some one to even come close

Remember your x1900xt is +50 over the gt I have, and you only manage to barely equal my stock speed score, in 3dmark06 hummmmmmm!

in 3dmark or 5 the same but in 03 and 01 remember we were hitting 40-50,000!!!!

that and your cpu score is still soft.

Netizen1 · « **Reply #138 on:** January 24, 2007, 01:27:32 PM »

I think this thread needs some major house-cleaning...

Time to update the first post with the Top 3 (or 5, or 10)

Congrats on the new rig / scores W1nTry

W1nTry · « **Reply #139 on:** January 24, 2007, 02:08:26 PM »

Quote from: Prowl on January 24, 2007, 01:21:54 PM

We all right here, waiting paitently for some one to even come close

Remember your x1900xt is +50 over the gt I have, and you only manage to barely equal my stock speed score, in 3dmark06 hummmmmmm!

in 3dmark or 5 the same but in 03 and 01 remember we were hitting 40-50,000!!!!

that and your cpu score is still soft.

And you point is? u have more ram, faster ram, faster next gen cores, better mobo, and my 'lame' AMD rig still matching yuh.

Carigamers · « **Reply #139 on:** January 24, 2007, 02:08:26 PM »

Author Topic: Benchmark Thread of yesteryear (Read 56534 times)

Carigamers

Carigamers

Carigamers

ShoutBox