Author Topic: Benchmark Thread of yesteryear (Read 56339 times)

TrinireturnofGamez · « **Reply #20 on:** July 23, 2005, 01:20:15 PM »

a benchmark is a standardized test for a system , be it hardware or not , the higher the score the faster your pc is :p .

Carigamers · « **Reply #20 on:** July 23, 2005, 01:20:15 PM »

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #21 on:** July 24, 2005, 09:14:19 PM »

added!

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #22 on:** July 25, 2005, 09:23:44 PM »

Added SnS Upgraded PC benchmark.

Sip & Surf PC01:
************
AMD Sempron 2800+ 754
512MB DDR 400
Nforce 4 754 Mobo
Geforce 6600 256MB PCI-E

3dmark 2001 : 12636
3dmark 2005 : 2572

Interesting to see the delta between these cards and it's 6600 GT brethren in the real world.

The difference being 100 - 400 3dmarks in the 2005 edition at stock.

Not bad at all. Everything should run beautifully at 1024x768. Time to test battlefield immc.

SPK · « **Reply #23 on:** July 25, 2005, 11:42:21 PM »

Oh, for comparison of my PC (low end crap

):

Intel Celeron 1.8 GHz
512 MB PC2100 DDR SDRAM
Biostar VIARAMA U8668 Motherboard
Nvidia GeForce FX 5600 128 MB AGP(4X)

3DMark2005 - 359.

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #24 on:** July 26, 2005, 12:04:14 AM »

pressure for that FX 5600.

change that to a 6600 GT and you could quadruple your performance easily.

cash pot iymc!

Carigamers · « **Reply #24 on:** July 26, 2005, 12:04:14 AM »

SPK · « **Reply #25 on:** July 26, 2005, 12:16:22 AM »

lol...I have a 256MB Radeon 9600 Pro to put in, just whenever I feel like it, or to be put in my new PC when I get the funds to build it

.

But in any case, Celeron sucks, so I dunno how much (if any), it will help out....

If I change it over to an AMD chip...along with better RAM....may be a better story, but as such, that's my money's dictation....

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #26 on:** July 26, 2005, 12:48:20 AM »

that radeon should give u a good boost man!

wtmc!

most games aren't cpu limited, so don't hate on the celeron.

I'll be very interested in seeing that score, with your config as is and the 9600.

SPK · « **Reply #27 on:** July 26, 2005, 08:24:06 AM »

Hmm...just ran it again, got 460...

Gonna put in the 9600 now and give it a test run...

SPK · « **Reply #28 on:** July 26, 2005, 09:36:48 AM »

With the 9600 Pro, I got a 3DMARK2005 score of 1234.

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #29 on:** July 26, 2005, 05:32:56 PM »

Nearly 3 times the power. Not bad at all.

Should be enough for battlefield 2 on medium

W1nTry · « **Reply #30 on:** July 27, 2005, 08:28:41 AM »

Well Baego thats not altogether tru.. alot of the newer games are CPU limited... anything Doom3 and up.. just crank it to 1600x1200 with AA and AN and you'll see CPU limitation LOL.

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #31 on:** July 27, 2005, 09:10:31 AM »

lol

come on man, we talking about reality here.

who in gatt games at that resolution and setting?

only lotto winners. and they surely won't have an issue buying a hot cpu to match, lol

W1nTry · « **Reply #32 on:** July 27, 2005, 09:17:24 AM »

Well virus should be able to run dat... I mean why else have a SLI rig with 2x6600GTs?

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #33 on:** July 27, 2005, 09:26:35 AM »

yeah, but I don't think SPK has the budget to spring for a dual sli setup just yet. lol

He still has quite a ways to go before his 1800mhz cpu holds back his gaming performance.

W1nTry · « **Reply #34 on:** July 27, 2005, 11:45:15 AM »

true true... OC dat b1atch!!!!

SPK · « **Reply #35 on:** July 27, 2005, 11:47:39 AM »

Actually I think it does hold it back sometimes, even running Halo on it, it starts to lag once there's any sizeable amount of data to render....

I waiting till me and my bro have aboput $5000 to spend to build a new PC, more designed for gaming/video editing....

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #36 on:** July 27, 2005, 12:11:37 PM »

the key word there is "think"

trust me, it doesn't.

TrinireturnofGamez · « **Reply #37 on:** July 31, 2005, 11:28:00 PM »

Halo is a badly coded game , it lags because the developers were too lazy to optimize it , Halo lags on the xbox sometimes .
Celeron won't hold you back much unless its less than 2ghz , cpu doesn't cause lag usually unless your cpu is less than 1.6ghz P4 / AMD 1600+ .

Starless_Everdark · « **Reply #38 on:** August 01, 2005, 01:33:58 AM »

nice score spk!

Spazosaurus · « **Reply #39 on:** August 14, 2005, 08:18:25 AM »

The_Daaak_Neo
**********
AMD XP 2500 @1.83 333fsb
EVGA 6800 Vanilla @ 370/749
Kingston Value Ram 512MB DDR333@400
Abit NF7-S V2.0

3dmark 2003 97xx

Carigamers · « **Reply #39 on:** August 14, 2005, 08:18:25 AM »

Author Topic: Benchmark Thread of yesteryear (Read 56339 times)

Carigamers

Carigamers

Carigamers

ShoutBox