wrong again,
Guru was not part of that "team" that was playing whole evening. He had
now settle down for a game. 1 game.
Hardly time to work up a frustration.
I for one wasn't vex at all. Infact, the only thing that bothered me was
that very quarrel that kept back de game!
Kayode James wrote:
>Baego, please.
>
>The game was causing alyuh REAL frustration. It was written clearly all over
>alyuh faces. I remmeber that sweat clear as day...
>
>Lil kicks we peltin fuh alyuh after and alyuh was gettin vex. Not a smile in
>de house.
>
>And yes! I remember this! Is not only frown alyuh was frownin...alyuh start
>to argue among yuhselves more than once fuh de evening! I will never fugget
>that night. I must remember...alyuh was real sourin de lime, and I was
>commenting on how vex alyuh was with de person next to me.
>
>That big argument with Guru was only the climax of a team of disgruntled
>Human players.
>
>The argument was about strategy, true, but it was only because no matter
>what alyuh tried that evening, alyuh wasn't beatin Beasts at all. Alyuh men
>was REAL vex!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: gatt-admin@gatt.co.tt [mailto:gatt-admin@gatt.co.tt]On Behalf Of
>[X]-Baego
>Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 8:16 PM
>To: gatt@gatt.co.tt
>Subject: Re: {GATT} Savage
>
>
>wrong again.
>
>Guru had played the game for like 45 minutes before that argument in
>particular. He was green as a chennet.
>
>I had been playing for days on days and wasn't frustrated at all. Mengsk
>was an avid beast man gone against, who fully understood the situation.
>
>The argument was solely about strategy.
>
>The last time we had an argument like that was Shark vs Guru in
>starcraft down at a sweat in arima.
>
>
>
>
>
>Kayode James wrote:
>
>
>
>>No...no matter what strat alyuh tried, it was still LEEX in Human mc. The
>>game was fundamentally unbalanced.
>>
>>THAT'S why they were so frustrated.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: gatt-admin@gatt.co.tt [mailto:gatt-admin@gatt.co.tt]On Behalf Of
>>Bellamy, Nigel
>>Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 5:26 PM
>>To: gatt@gatt.co.tt
>>Subject: RE: {GATT} Savage
>>
>>
>>Not at all
>>
>>They were quarreling over strategy.
>>
>>How to build defense, what weapons to research first....when to build
>>garrison....where to build garrison. Who should command, who should defend,
>>who should attack...the works.
>>
>>Quarrel idmc!
>>
>>I was the oone harping about balance issues, of which there were a few
>>notable ones.
>>
>>Convinced of that, though rommel still believes he was just "superior". Lol
>>
>>1) Beast commander's ability to heal a unit in the field
>>2) Ultimate range and firepower of the flame tower compared to the human's
>>mortar tower
>>3) diffuse of sachel charge by flame tower due to splash damage.
>>4) Infinite ammo and range of Summoner compared to human siege
>>5) Superiority of leap over the human block.
>>
>>A good game would be with a 4-6 ratio, 4 beasts against 6
>>humans....advantages considered.
>>
>>I'm not sure how many of these issues have been addressed with the latest
>>patch for savage. Can't wait to give it a run again.
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Kayode James [mailto:spider-guy@tstt.net.tt]
>>Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 5:19 PM
>>To: gatt@gatt.co.tt
>>Subject: RE: {GATT} Savage
>>
>>You realise of course, that the reason they were quarreling is because of
>>the game's lack of balance, which is inherently a bad strike against the
>>game?
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: gatt-admin@gatt.co.tt [mailto:gatt-admin@gatt.co.tt]On Behalf Of
>>Bellamy, Nigel
>>Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 4:59 PM
>>To
>>
>>______________________________________________________________________
>>BG Energy Holdings Limited (a member of BG Group)
>>Registered in England No: 3763515
>>Registered Address:
>> 100 Thames Valley Park Drive
>> Reading
>> Berkshire RG6 1PT UK
>>Telephone: +44 (0) 118 935 3222
>>Website:
http://www.BG-Group.com>>
>>This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above. As this
>>e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information, please
>>advise us immediately if you are not the named addressee or the person
>>responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee. The
>>contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken.
>>______________________________________________________________________
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To remove yourself from this list, send an email to majordomo@gatt.co.tt
>>with 'unsubscribe gatt' in the body.
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To remove yourself from this list, send an email to majordomo@gatt.co.tt
>>with 'unsubscribe gatt' in the body.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To remove yourself from this list, send an email to majordomo@gatt.co.tt
>with 'unsubscribe gatt' in the body.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To remove yourself from this list, send an email to majordomo@gatt.co.tt
>with 'unsubscribe gatt' in the body.
>
>
>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, send an email to majordomo@gatt.co.tt
with 'unsubscribe gatt' in the body.
