Battlefield 3

[WarOne]

Buh wheys, why allyuh jump on my comment so even tho I go beat allyuh down with my controller, but that is beside the point... what was the point again. 

[VirtueTT]

the point was that Emperor couldn't touch you even if u were using a NES control.   

[Notnice]

the point was that Emperor couldn't touch you even if u were using a NES control.   

lol

[EmperorXavier]

the point was that Emperor couldn't touch you even if u were using a NES control.   

i can see the book labelled "jokes for dummies" is doing u well buddy..  nice one

[WarOne]

the point was that Emperor couldn't touch you even if u were using a NES control.  

I see what you did there Virtue... how could you(nodding in agreement) say such a thing.

[EmperorXavier]

the point was that Emperor couldn't touch you even if u were using a NES control.  

i can see the book labelled "jokes for dummies" is doing u well buddy..  nice one

please don't take this the Arcmanovish way, we just joking around ok buddy!!

[ViCe]

really cool video.. i really like number 7 and the pistol killer... but one can see that the console boys don't play this game "fast" enough. u guys would die in the PC world.

meh, i play all my games fast

[Notnice]

[EmperorXavier]

love this gun M98B

[Arcmanov]

Waayyyyyy.  Now that is just ridiculously OP.

Basically a 1-shot kill anywhere from the waist up? 
The majority of the kills were just that.  I hope that gets fixed in the retail game.

As a rule, sniper-rifles should be 1-shot lethal from head-shots only.

This is why DICE self had to end up nerfing the sniper-rifles in Medal Of Honor.

[W1nTry]

As a rule, sniper-rifles should be 1-shot lethal from head-shots only.

Just outta curiousity... irl... a single LANDED shot from say a Barett 50 Cal WOULDN'T be lethal? jes saying is all

[EmperorXavier]

Waayyyyyy.  Now that is just ridiculously OP.

Basically a 1-shot kill anywhere from the waist up? 
The majority of the kills were just that.  I hope that gets fixed in the retail game.

As a rule, sniper-rifles should be 1-shot lethal from head-shots only.

This is why DICE self had to end up nerfing the sniper-rifles in Medal Of Honor.

i say it should be based on the weapon, i have no problem with a 50 cal taking a one shot one kill..also this weapon has a steady grip and control unlike the sv98(which most ppl hate) besides warone

[Spazosaurus]

Waayyyyyy.  Now that is just ridiculously OP.

Basically a 1-shot kill anywhere from the waist up? 
The majority of the kills were just that.  I hope that gets fixed in the retail game.

As a rule, sniper-rifles should be 1-shot lethal from head-shots only.

This is why DICE self had to end up nerfing the sniper-rifles in Medal Of Honor.

Nah man, any nerfing of the sniper rifle in bf3 will be met by complete disgust from me. That m98b looking PERFECT!!

[Arcmanov]

Somebody always has to play the 'irl' card when sniper-rifle discussion comes up eh...  :|

Cap...you wouldn't even know IF it got nerfed from beta to retail.

Only the people who like playing Recon won't have a problem with it.

The aiming in BF3 is too 'easy' for a weapon like that, and the shooter
in that vid demonstrated that easily by quick-scoping and killing two,
or three enemies in quick succession.  Didn't even need much work for the crosshairs to settle
on target.  If you're gonna make it that easy to aim that rifle, then make it harder to kill with
body shots.  Two shots minimum.  Makes it that much more fair (in my opinion of course).

So you're running, out in the open, and you get one shot to the body, you get seriously wounded,
so one time you look for cover.  If the sniper's good, he kills you with the second shot.  I'm OK with that.

If he's really good, he gets you with a head-shot, 1st hit, and well, it's game over.  I'm OK with that.

Quick-scope, single-hit, instant-kill body-shots.  Not OK with that.


Now, if you could choose between carrying smoke grenades or frag grenades (all classes), then you
have an effective counter right there, but I'm pretty sure this isn't the case.

I guess we'll just have to wait and see won't we. 

[Notnice]

http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield_bad_company/archive/2011/10/13/battleblog-13-from-the-streets-of-paris-to-the-outskirts-of-tehran-battlefield-3-multiplayer-map-reveal.aspx#_tab

love this gun M98B

Me to that gun was deadly arc should know lol

Cap...you wouldn't even know IF it got nerfed from beta to retail.

I would know lol.

In one day i got over 100 kills with the M98B (which i think it's a 50 cal)

[shivanandrs]

Somebody always has to play the 'irl' card when sniper-rifle discussion comes up eh...  :|

lol! As they say, Balance > Realism in games like these.

The SV98 had the right balance imo, 1 to the head, 2 to the body for a kill. I guess i could live with a OHK with the most powerful rifle to the upper torso only.

[shivanandrs]

love this gun M98B

Damn...love the sound!!

[EmperorXavier]

Somebody always has to play the 'irl' card when sniper-rifle discussion comes up eh...  :|

Cap...you wouldn't even know IF it got nerfed from beta to retail.

Only the people who like playing Recon won't have a problem with it.

The aiming in BF3 is too 'easy' for a weapon like that, and the shooter
in that vid demonstrated that easily by quick-scoping and killing two,
or three enemies in quick succession.  Didn't even need much work for the crosshairs to settle
on target.  If you're gonna make it that easy to aim that rifle, then make it harder to kill with
body shots.  Two shots minimum.  Makes it that much more fair (in my opinion of course).

So you're running, out in the open, and you get one shot to the body, you get seriously wounded,
so one time you look for cover.  If the sniper's good, he kills you with the second shot.  I'm OK with that.

If he's really good, he gets you with a head-shot, 1st hit, and well, it's game over.  I'm OK with that.

Quick-scope, single-hit, instant-kill body-shots.  Not OK with that.


Now, if you could choose between carrying smoke grenades or frag grenades (all classes), then you
have an effective counter right there, but I'm pretty sure this isn't the case.

I guess we'll just have to wait and see won't we.  

aye man a sniper in a rush map may have some advantage but a sniper in a conquest map is a sitting duck in some instances, there are many ways to get a sniper,the smoke grenade, man that totally take out their vision, laser red dot which does the same thing basically, and the give away reflective scope, come on couldn't get easier. i have killed snipers from long ranges using my trusty AKs and other sub-machines weapons, this guy was clearly playing with some noobs who was just running around because if it was the =[PT]= up in that mofo then all those hiding points that he was hiding in the game would have been covered... say no to noobism.

[WarOne]

I found that when I was sniping I got one shot kills with hits from the chest up and I hope they keep this so.  Xavier the SV98 is dat shiz, that sniper rifle in the vid you posted looks good as well will see how it is when I get my hands on it.

[Notnice]

Not thing new but was posted on the bf YouTube page