Author Topic: Crixxtachi's BenchMarks (Read 14992 times)

Spazosaurus · « **Reply #60 on:** September 15, 2009, 01:07:38 AM »

TWO upgrades for Crix in one year? o_O

Carigamers · « **Reply #60 on:** September 15, 2009, 01:07:38 AM »

Philosophical45 · « **Reply #61 on:** September 15, 2009, 05:50:50 AM »

Quote from: Captain Awesome on September 15, 2009, 01:07:38 AM

TWO upgrades for Crix in one year? o_O

LOLOL!

Crixx_Creww · « **Reply #62 on:** September 15, 2009, 06:40:00 AM »

hmm
its going to be 3 in one year

wait for that one

will be... interesting.

as for temps, i dont know how to explain it, but look at the temps on the right of the screen
i rebuilt the board from floor up, reinstalled vista.... changed teh layout of the lasco fan, found what seems to be a perfect position for it and the damn processor never goes higher than 19 degrees with the ac on, i swear. It idles @ 15 degrees @ 3.4

Philosophical45 · « **Reply #63 on:** September 15, 2009, 06:46:19 AM »

Quote from: Crixx_Creww on September 15, 2009, 06:40:00 AM

hmm
its going to be 3 in one year wait for that one will be... interesting.

as for temps, i dont know how to explain it, but look at the temps on the right of the screen
i rebuilt the board from floor up, reinstalled vista.... changed teh layout of the lasco fan, found what seems to be a perfect position for it and the damn processor never goes higher than 19 degrees with the ac on, i swear. It idles @ 15 degrees @ 3.4

wait i now seeing dat... waayz man u could hit ah 3.6ghz easy then..

Arcmanov · « **Reply #64 on:** September 15, 2009, 07:07:35 AM »

Quote from: Crixx_Creww on September 15, 2009, 06:40:00 AM

hmm
its going to be 3 in one year wait for that one will be... interesting.

as for temps, i dont know how to explain it, but look at the temps on the right of the screen
i rebuilt the board from floor up, reinstalled vista.... changed teh layout of the lasco fan, found what seems to be a perfect position for it and the damn processor never goes higher than 19 degrees with the ac on, i swear. It idles @ 15 degrees @ 3.4

So then am I to believe that your ambient temp in that room is about 14/15 deg C?
That's a mighty cold room. Your CPU temp could never be lower than your ambient temp.

If thats what your getting at idle then you could get VERY vicioud with your voltages.
Vcore will need to go up to about 1.45V or so. PLL will need to go up to about 1.65-1.88V.
Chipset voltage will need to be about 1.35-1.40V.

Get to it man. Thou doth sticketh.

Carigamers · « **Reply #64 on:** September 15, 2009, 07:07:35 AM »

Spazosaurus · « **Reply #65 on:** September 15, 2009, 07:13:14 AM »

6 months out of the q6600 ocing is long enough for me to forget all my stable voltages. 3.6 should e definitely achieveable at those temps.

Crixx_Creww · « **Reply #66 on:** September 15, 2009, 10:17:42 AM »

with that lasco fan and ac on
i cant sit too close to the pc
my leg feels like it will fall off.

it may indeed be that the temp sensor playing the ass i dont know
iam using the built in asus temp sensor program, ill get some others and compare.

TriniXaeno · « **Reply #67 on:** September 15, 2009, 10:30:20 AM »

crixx, yuh mc!!!

You get me mad with that score. Watch out next month, you've been warned.

Kraeoss · « **Reply #68 on:** September 15, 2009, 12:49:52 PM »

yea that temp sensor seems borked lol... just take that temp with a grain of salt.... just in case lol...

W1nTry · « **Reply #69 on:** September 15, 2009, 01:25:17 PM »

Here's what you can do to check, boot into the BIOS and see what your temps are, surprisingly when in BIOS temps tend to be pretty indicative of a slightly loaded system in the OS. Compare and contrast.

Crixx_Creww · « **Reply #70 on:** September 15, 2009, 02:12:54 PM »

ill do that

Redfish · « **Reply #71 on:** September 15, 2009, 03:45:25 PM »

Someone got bitten by the upgrade bug^^ lol change yuh pc specs to suit nah man. You aint rockin a 8800GTS again etc

W1nTry · « **Reply #72 on:** September 15, 2009, 03:47:26 PM »

Actually isn't he? the 8800GTS G92 version is the same as a 9800GTX which is the slightly lower bredren of 9800GTX+... so in effect it's still the GTS

Redfish · « **Reply #73 on:** September 15, 2009, 03:49:07 PM »

Errrr ok then 0_o well I was just going with what I saw on his 3Dmark06 pic

Philosophical45 · « **Reply #74 on:** September 15, 2009, 04:58:56 PM »

Quote from: W1nTry on September 15, 2009, 03:47:26 PM

Actually isn't he? the 8800GTS G92 version is the same as a 9800GTX which is the slightly lower bredren of 9800GTX+... so in effect it's still the GTS

what?

Philosophical45 · « **Reply #75 on:** September 15, 2009, 05:18:04 PM »

Quote from: Hard O/C on September 15, 2009, 05:11:36 PM

Quote from: Philosophical45 on September 15, 2009, 04:58:56 PM
Quote from: W1nTry on September 15, 2009, 03:47:26 PM
Actually isn't he? the 8800GTS G92 version is the same as a 9800GTX which is the slightly lower bredren of 9800GTX+... so in effect it's still the GTS

what?

He was running one of my 8800GTS which is the 96 sp version. Considering i have the EVGA version to his 'new' card i trying not to try and stomp his score with my Xeon setup

ok, so doesn't that now contradict w1ntry's explanation? O_o

Spazosaurus · « **Reply #76 on:** September 15, 2009, 06:01:06 PM »

On other words, 9800gtx+ is just a rebranded version of the 9800gtx which is a rebranded version of the 8800gts g92, which is a rebranding of the 8800gtx.

Redfish · « **Reply #77 on:** September 15, 2009, 08:19:28 PM »

*facepalm* um can we just agree on what is written on his GPU.....y'all had to go and get all technical up in this place lol

Carigamers · « **Reply #77 on:** September 15, 2009, 08:19:28 PM »

Author Topic: Crixxtachi's BenchMarks (Read 14992 times)

Carigamers

Carigamers

Carigamers

ShoutBox