Author Topic: Rage's Benchies (Read 15348 times)

Arcmanov · « **Reply #20 on:** August 19, 2008, 08:55:31 PM »

Yeah, but a big fat 'BOOOOOOOOO' to Nvidia, for using PhysX to artificially inflate scores.
How then can a direct comparison can be made to similar ATI products, or even to older
Nividia GPUs that the new driver has no effect on.

That result is impressive nonetheless, but in the end its almost like a 'cheat code'.
Come on Nvidia...better dan dat.

Carigamers · « **Reply #20 on:** August 19, 2008, 08:55:31 PM »

Philosophical45 · « **Reply #21 on:** August 19, 2008, 09:06:37 PM »

well it's really up to ATI to do the same now, which i believe is in the works.

rassmatic · « **Reply #22 on:** January 17, 2009, 03:26:52 PM »

Just thought I'd put up my PCMark Vantage score. Strange that everyone only post 3DMark scores but none for PCMark. Mine is 6079.

rassmatic · « **Reply #23 on:** April 21, 2009, 11:52:12 AM »

Finally got my CPU stable at 3.20Ghz. not a huge leap over 3.04Ghz, but an improvement none the less.

Arcmanov · « **Reply #24 on:** April 21, 2009, 12:31:17 PM »

Interesting result, compared to my Core 2 Quad rig. I'm wondering what accounts for the difference
in SM2.0 score. You reach 17K plus already with that OC, so imagine the result if you OC that CPU
some more (I'm sure it can go higher), and the GPU.

Overclock eeet!!!

Carigamers · « **Reply #24 on:** April 21, 2009, 12:31:17 PM »

Netizen1 · « **Reply #25 on:** April 21, 2009, 12:37:22 PM »

Yeah man, up the multiplier to 9x and let's see what happens next

Kraeoss · « **Reply #26 on:** April 21, 2009, 12:39:28 PM »

dude that Q9450 is a boss oc chip eh unless your vid is like 1.3 lol which would make it a sour chip to have... shoot for 4 ?

Nephilim · « **Reply #27 on:** April 21, 2009, 12:57:34 PM »

that chip supposed to be able to do 3.2 on stock voltage.

hold on...

while i do have the q9400 as i believe the q9450 is the lower power version to my own with bigger cache.

so for the least it should be able to take the same FSB as mine with ease.

scratch that - i r a bollocks - is the other way around.

it may be a board issue. then again i on a giga board...arc school him on the imbaness of giga

rassmatic · « **Reply #28 on:** April 21, 2009, 01:56:41 PM »

i good deh 4 now

W1nTry · « **Reply #29 on:** April 21, 2009, 02:03:29 PM »

What I find strange is his gaming suite score is lower than mines and I have a 8800GT vs what is effectively 8800GT in SLI... curious

Nephilim · « **Reply #30 on:** April 21, 2009, 02:14:06 PM »

chups. doh study he rage. before he buss ah next lvl core haxx and we see ah dual core 88gt in the place

w1n we yet to see the OC on yuh new quad. is j00 da sticking?

W1nTry · « **Reply #31 on:** April 21, 2009, 02:18:03 PM »

I did post about it, doesn't seem I can keep it stable or at least what I consider stable. But I may just for the sake of running it, see what benchmarks I can get away with and post em XD

rassmatic · « **Reply #32 on:** April 21, 2009, 02:25:41 PM »

@W1nTry - hmmm, u right. i'll have to look into that.

Netizen1 · « **Reply #33 on:** April 21, 2009, 02:59:36 PM »

Just came across this on another forum
~~http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=494749~~

interesting eh?

[EDIT]
My bad, try this link then http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=475784

Kraeoss · « **Reply #34 on:** April 21, 2009, 03:11:25 PM »

what ?? that's the Q9650... rage what hsf are you using... ? like get a tuniq tower or a xigmatek rifle strap on 2 fans and voila uber temps anf speed. u can consult this oc guide if you want:http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.aspx?catid=28&threadid=2057083&enterthread=y

rassmatic · « **Reply #35 on:** April 21, 2009, 03:55:26 PM »

new PCMark scores....

now dais more like it

oh, and i'm using a Thermalright Ultra 120 extreme. the "best of the best". steups. and yes, it IS lapped.

Kraeoss · « **Reply #36 on:** April 21, 2009, 04:05:53 PM »

after doing more research i have come to find that this chip is very selective lol... most guys can get it to 3.2ghz stable above that is pressha...

Netizen1 · « **Reply #37 on:** April 21, 2009, 04:40:58 PM »

Quote from: Kraeoss on April 21, 2009, 03:11:25 PM

what ?? that's the Q9650...

Sorry I pasted the wrong link

I put in a link to a 4GHz 9450

Quote from: Netizen1 on April 21, 2009, 02:59:36 PM

Just came across this on another forum
~~http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=494749~~

interesting eh?

[EDIT]
My bad, try this link then http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=475784

W1nTry · « **Reply #38 on:** April 21, 2009, 04:43:48 PM »

I guess PCMark Vantage isn't SLI aware... I still think Rage's Gaming suite score should be higher... then again you could blame the green team for broken drivers XD

Kraeoss · « **Reply #39 on:** April 21, 2009, 04:48:12 PM »

Quote from: Netizen1 on April 21, 2009, 04:40:58 PM

Quote from: Kraeoss on April 21, 2009, 03:11:25 PM
what ?? that's the Q9650...

Sorry I pasted the wrong link

I put in a link to a 4GHz 9450

Quote from: Netizen1 on April 21, 2009, 02:59:36 PM
Just came across this on another forum
~~http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=494749~~

interesting eh?

[EDIT]
My bad, try this link then http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=475784

only problem there is that was it under a phase cooler or did it have insane volts...

Carigamers · « **Reply #39 on:** April 21, 2009, 04:48:12 PM »

Author Topic: Rage's Benchies (Read 15348 times)

Carigamers

Carigamers

Carigamers

ShoutBox